Deep Research Archives - gettectonic.com
agents and copilots
21Apr

Copilots and Agents

Which Agentic AI Features Truly Matter? Modern large language models (LLMs) are often evaluated based on their ability to support agentic AI capabilities. However, the effectiveness of these features depends on the specific problems AI agents are designed to solve. The term “AI agent” is frequently applied to any AI application that performs intelligent tasks on behalf of a user. However, true AI agents—of which there are still relatively few—differ significantly from conventional AI assistants. This discussion focuses specifically on personal AI applications rather than AI solutions for teams and organizations. In this domain, AI agents are more comparable to “copilots” than traditional AI assistants. What Sets AI Agents Apart from Other AI Tools? Clarifying the distinctions between AI agents, copilots, and assistants helps define their unique capabilities: AI Copilots AI copilots represent an advanced subset of AI assistants. Unlike traditional assistants, copilots leverage broader context awareness and long-term memory to provide intelligent suggestions. While ChatGPT already functions as a form of AI copilot, its ability to determine what to remember remains an area for improvement. A defining characteristic of AI copilots—one absent in ChatGPT—is proactive behavior. For example, an AI copilot can generate intelligent suggestions in response to common user requests by recognizing patterns observed across multiple interactions. This learning often occurs through in-context learning, while fine-tuning remains optional. Additionally, copilots can retain sequences of past user requests and analyze both memory and current context to anticipate user needs and offer relevant suggestions at the appropriate time. Although AI copilots may appear proactive, their operational environment is typically confined to a specific application. Unlike AI agents, which take real actions within broader environments, copilots are generally limited to triggering user-facing messages. However, the integration of background LLM calls introduces a level of automation beyond traditional AI assistants, whose outputs are always explicitly requested. AI Agents and Reasoning In personal applications, an AI agent functions similarly to an AI copilot but incorporates at least one of three additional capabilities: Reasoning and self-monitoring are critical LLM capabilities that support goal-oriented behavior. Major LLM providers continue to enhance these features, with recent advancements including: As of March 2025, Grok 3 and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking rank highest on the LMArena leaderboard, which evaluates AI performance based on user assessments. This competitive landscape highlights the rapid evolution of reasoning-focused LLMs, a critical factor for the advancement of AI agents. Defining AI Agents While reasoning is often cited as a defining feature of AI agents, it is fundamentally an LLM capability rather than a distinction between agents and copilots. Both require reasoning—agents for decision-making and copilots for generating intelligent suggestions. Similarly, an agent’s ability to take action in an external environment is not exclusive to AI agents. Many AI copilots perform actions within a confined system. For example, an AI copilot assisting with document editing in a web-based CMS can both provide feedback and make direct modifications within the system. The same applies to sensor capabilities. AI copilots not only observe user actions but also monitor entire systems, detecting external changes to documents, applications, or web pages. Key Distinctions: Autonomy and Versatility The fundamental differences between AI copilots and AI agents lie in autonomy and versatility: If an AI system is labeled as a domain-specific agent or an industry-specific vertical agent, it may essentially function as an AI copilot. The distinction between copilots and agents is becoming increasingly nuanced. Therefore, the term AI agent should be reserved for highly versatile, multi-purpose AI systems capable of operating across diverse domains. Notable examples include OpenAI’s Operator and Deep Research. Like1 Related Posts Who is Salesforce? Who is Salesforce? Here is their story in their own words. From our inception, we’ve proudly embraced the identity of Read more Salesforce Marketing Cloud Transactional Emails Salesforce Marketing Cloud Transactional Emails are immediate, automated, non-promotional messages crucial to business operations and customer satisfaction, such as order Read more Salesforce Unites Einstein Analytics with Financial CRM Salesforce has unveiled a comprehensive analytics solution tailored for wealth managers, home office professionals, and retail bankers, merging its Financial Read more AI-Driven Propensity Scores AI plays a crucial role in propensity score estimation as it can discern underlying patterns between treatments and confounding variables Read more

Read More
April 21, 2025in Agentic AI, AI Tools, Data, Google, Salesforce
ai agents
29Mar

AI Agents

What AI Agents Are Available on the Market? Limitations of Operator, Computer Use, and Similar Agents OpenAI Operator can be seen as a semi-autonomous agent, but many users note that it asks too many questions and requires excessive confirmations, even in situations that pose no risk:“Operator is like driving a car with cruise control — occasionally taking your foot off the pedals — but it’s far from full-blown autopilot.” Furthermore, although Operator is technically designed to interact with any website, in reality, it’s far from a universal solution. It works reliably on a predefined set of platforms for tasks like shopping and restaurant reservations (such as Instacart and OpenTable), where its functionality has been tested. But outside of these, its performance is inconsistent — sometimes even generating incorrect or entirely fabricated data. Google’s Project Mariner, which aims to offer similar capabilities within Chrome, remains in closed beta for now. Meanwhile, many are eagerly anticipating a consumer product from Claude, which released the API for its Claude Computer Use agent (built on a slightly different principles) back in October 2024. One thing seems certain, though — it will be even more “cautious” than Operator, meaning it’s unlikely to handle tasks like sending emails or posting on social media on your behalf. Thus, browser-based agents come with at least two key limitations:— they work reliably only on a predefined set of websites;— certain actions are prohibited (for example, allowing an agent to send emails autonomously could create conflicts between its owner and others). Mobile agents face similar constraints. Take Perplexity Assistant, one of the earliest attempts at a “versatile” mobile AI agent — it still supports only a limited range of apps where it can operate on behalf of the user. Deep Research Agents To highlight the contrast, let’s look at AI agents built specifically for deep research. This category has seen a surge in new tools recently, and they deliver significantly better results than standard AI-powered web search. Deep Research tools qualify as AI agents due to their high level of autonomy. At this stage, no truly agentic tool exists that can handle any problem on our behalf — even in a semi-autonomous mode, let alone a fully autonomous one. However, there are highly effective agents within specific domains, such as deep research agents. With that in mind, let’s categorize typical AI applications into several groups (use cases) and tackle the following question for each group. Like Related Posts Who is Salesforce? Who is Salesforce? Here is their story in their own words. From our inception, we’ve proudly embraced the identity of Read more Salesforce Marketing Cloud Transactional Emails Salesforce Marketing Cloud Transactional Emails are immediate, automated, non-promotional messages crucial to business operations and customer satisfaction, such as order Read more Salesforce Unites Einstein Analytics with Financial CRM Salesforce has unveiled a comprehensive analytics solution tailored for wealth managers, home office professionals, and retail bankers, merging its Financial Read more AI-Driven Propensity Scores AI plays a crucial role in propensity score estimation as it can discern underlying patterns between treatments and confounding variables Read more

Read More
March 29, 2025in Data, Google, Salesforce
agents and copilots
11Mar

When to Use AI Agents and Copilots

Do Organizations Need AI Agents or Copilots for These Use Cases? Organizations often explore AI solutions for specific operational needs. Three primary AI use cases include: The question arises: Which AI tools best suit these needs? Should an organization invest in a high-end AI subscription, such as ChatGPT Pro with the Operator agent ($200/month), or opt for ChatGPT Plus with the o3-mini reasoning model and copilot features, such as memory and custom GPTs? AI Tool Selection Criteria When evaluating AI agents versus AI copilots, key considerations include: A. The time and effort required to articulate the problem for the AI. B. The level of control preferred in the problem-solving process. C. The importance of achieving the most optimal outcome. Use Case 1: Shopping AI Agents Many existing AI shopping solutions are labeled as agents, but they do not exhibit true autonomy. Instead, they serve as assistants with limited capabilities. For instance, Perplexity’s “Shop Like a Pro” assists with selecting products but depends on vendor integration for completing purchases, rather than executing transactions autonomously. Despite current limitations, some users create their own AI shopping agents by integrating browser-based AI tools with no-code automation platforms like n8n, Zapier, or Make.com. These custom-built agents offer greater autonomy and versatility than off-the-shelf solutions. However, the need for AI agents in shopping remains debatable. The act of shopping often provides a sense of anticipation and engagement, which a fully autonomous AI agent could eliminate. In contrast, AI copilots can enhance the experience by reducing time investment while preserving user involvement. The same applies to vacation planning—while an AI agent could book optimal flights and accommodations, many users prefer a guided approach to maintain a sense of anticipation and control. Moreover, financial transactions should not be fully entrusted to AI agents due to potential risks. AI-powered form-filling can be beneficial, but human oversight remains essential. The decision to use an AI agent for shopping depends on how much involvement users wish to retain in the process. Use Case 2: Executive AI Assistant Many professionals seek AI-driven solutions to handle routine tasks such as scheduling, reminders, and email management. However, current AI assistants lack full autonomy in managing these activities comprehensively. For instance, Google’s Gemini Advanced provides AI-powered features in Google Calendar and Gmail, but its integration remains limited—requiring manual activation and lacking full interconnectivity between tasks. Similarly, Apple Intelligence offers fragmented AI functionalities rather than a seamless assistant experience. Some technically inclined users have developed custom executive assistants using automation tools. However, for the broader market, fully functional, user-friendly AI executive assistants are still in development by major tech companies. When evaluating the necessity of AI agents in routine tasks, the key factors include: Use Case 3: AI Research Deep research AI agents have significantly outperformed traditional search methods in both speed and accuracy, provided sufficient relevant data is available. Advanced AI-driven research tools, such as Perplexity Deep Research and Grok 3 DeepSearch, have demonstrated superior efficiency compared to manual search. Despite their capabilities, these agents often require refinement in their responses. AI-generated reports may focus on irrelevant details without proper guidance. However, many researchers find that leveraging AI significantly enhances the efficiency and breadth of their work. For organizations, the decision to utilize AI agents for research depends on their need for: While AI agents remain imperfect, they are rapidly evolving, particularly in deep research applications. As technology advances, their ability to support decision-making processes will likely continue to expand. Like Related Posts Who is Salesforce? Who is Salesforce? Here is their story in their own words. From our inception, we’ve proudly embraced the identity of Read more Salesforce Unites Einstein Analytics with Financial CRM Salesforce has unveiled a comprehensive analytics solution tailored for wealth managers, home office professionals, and retail bankers, merging its Financial Read more AI-Driven Propensity Scores AI plays a crucial role in propensity score estimation as it can discern underlying patterns between treatments and confounding variables Read more Tectonic’s Successful Salesforce Track Record Salesforce Technology Services Integrator – Tectonic has successfully delivered Salesforce in a variety of industries including Public Sector, Hospitality, Manufacturing, Read more

Read More
March 11, 2025in AI Tools, Data, Google, Technology
gettectonic.com