MCG Archives - gettectonic.com
AI Energy Solution

AI Energy Solution

Could the AI Energy Solution Make AI Unstoppable? The Rise of Brain-Based AI In 2002, Jason Padgett, a furniture salesman from Tacoma, Washington, experienced a life-altering transformation after a traumatic brain injury. Following a violent assault, Padgett began to perceive the world through intricate patterns of geometry and fractals, developing a profound, intuitive grasp of advanced mathematical concepts—despite no formal education in the subject. His extraordinary abilities, emerging from the brain’s adaptation to injury, revealed an essential truth: the human brain’s remarkable capacity for resilience and reorganization. This phenomenon underscores the brain’s reliance on inhibition, a critical mechanism that silences or separates neural processes to conserve energy, clarify signals, and enable complex cognition. Researcher Iain McGilchrist highlights that this ability to step back from immediate stimuli fosters reflection and thoughtful action. Yet this foundational trait—key to the brain’s efficiency and adaptability—is absent from today’s dominant AI models. Current AI systems, like Transformers powering tools such as ChatGPT, lack inhibition. These models rely on probabilistic predictions derived from massive datasets, resulting in inefficiencies and an inability to learn independently. However, the rise of brain-based AI seeks to emulate aspects of inhibition, creating systems that are not only more energy-efficient but also capable of learning from real-world, primary data without constant retraining. The AI Energy Problem Today’s AI landscape is dominated by Transformer models, known for their ability to process vast amounts of secondary data, such as scraped text, images, and videos. While these models have propelled significant advancements, their insatiable demand for computational power has exposed critical flaws. As energy costs rise and infrastructure investment balloons, the industry is beginning to reevaluate its reliance on Transformer models. This shift has sparked interest in brain-inspired AI, which promises sustainable solutions through decentralized, self-learning systems that mimic human cognitive efficiency. What Brain-Based AI Solves Brain-inspired models aim to address three fundamental challenges with current AI systems: The human brain’s ability to build cohesive perceptions from fragmented inputs—like stitching together a clear visual image from saccades and peripheral signals—serves as a blueprint for these models, demonstrating how advanced functionality can emerge from minimal energy expenditure. The Secret to Brain Efficiency: A Thousand Brains Jeff Hawkins, the creator of the Palm Pilot, has dedicated decades to understanding the brain’s neocortex and its potential for AI design. His Thousand Brains Theory of Intelligence posits that the neocortex operates through a universal algorithm, with approximately 150,000 cortical columns functioning as independent processors. These columns identify patterns, sequences, and spatial representations, collaborating to form a cohesive perception of the world. Hawkins’ brain-inspired approach challenges traditional AI paradigms by emphasizing predictive coding and distributed processing, reducing energy demands while enabling real-time learning. Unlike Transformers, which centralize control, brain-based AI uses localized decision-making, creating a more scalable and adaptive system. Is AI in a Bubble? Despite immense investment in AI, the market’s focus remains heavily skewed toward infrastructure rather than applications. NVIDIA’s data centers alone generate 5 billion in annualized revenue, while major AI applications collectively bring in just billion. This imbalance has led to concerns about an AI bubble, reminiscent of the early 2000s dot-com and telecom busts, where overinvestment in infrastructure outpaced actual demand. The sustainability of current AI investments hinges on the viability of new models like brain-based AI. If these systems gain widespread adoption within the next decade, today’s energy-intensive Transformer models may become obsolete, signaling a profound market correction. Controlling Brain-Based AI: A Philosophical Divide The rise of brain-based AI introduces not only technical challenges but also philosophical ones. Scholars like Joscha Bach argue for a reductionist approach, constructing intelligence through mathematical models that approximate complex phenomena. Others advocate for holistic designs, warning that purely rational systems may lack the broader perspective needed to navigate ethical and unpredictable scenarios. This philosophical debate mirrors the physical divide in the human brain: one hemisphere excels in reductionist analysis, while the other integrates holistic perspectives. As AI systems grow increasingly complex, the philosophical framework guiding their development will profoundly shape their behavior—and their impact on society. The future of AI lies in balancing efficiency, adaptability, and ethical design. Whether brain-based models succeed in replacing Transformers will depend not only on their technical advantages but also on our ability to guide their evolution responsibly. As AI inches closer to mimicking human intelligence, the stakes have never been higher. Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Health Cloud Brings Healthcare Transformation Following swiftly after last week’s successful launch of Financial Services Cloud, Salesforce has announced the second installment in its series Read more Top Ten Reasons Why Tectonic Loves the Cloud The Cloud is Good for Everyone – Why Tectonic loves the cloud You don’t need to worry about tracking licenses. Read more

Read More
AI in Networking

AI in Networking

AI Tools in Networking: Tailoring Capabilities to Unique Needs AI tools are becoming increasingly common across various industries, offering a wide range of functionalities. However, network engineers may not require every capability these tools provide. Each network has distinct requirements that align with specific business objectives, necessitating that network engineers and developers select AI toolsets tailored to their networks’ needs. While network teams often desire similar AI capabilities, they also encounter common challenges in integrating these tools into their systems. The Rise of AI in Networking Though AI is not a new concept—having existed for decades in the form of automated and expert systems—it is gaining unprecedented attention. According to Jim Frey, principal analyst for networking at TechTarget’s Enterprise Strategy Group, many organizations have not fully grasped AI’s potential in production environments over the past three years. “AI has been around for a long time, but the interesting thing is, only a minority—not even half—have really said they’re using it effectively in production for the last three years,” Frey noted. Generative AI (GenAI) has significantly contributed to this renewed interest in AI. Shamus McGillicuddy, vice president of research at Enterprise Management Associates, categorizes AI tools into two main types: GenAI and AIOps (AI for IT operations). “Generative AI, like ChatGPT, has recently surged in popularity, becoming a focal point of discussion among IT professionals,” McGillicuddy explained. “AIOps, on the other hand, encompasses machine learning, anomaly detection, and analytics.” The increasing complexity of networks is another factor driving the adoption of AI in networking. Frey highlighted that the demands of modern network environments are beyond human capability to manage manually, making AI engines a vital solution. Essential AI Tool Capabilities for Networks While individual network needs vary, many network engineers seek similar functionalities when integrating AI. Commonly desired capabilities include: According to McGillicuddy’s research, network optimization and automated troubleshooting are among the most popular use cases for AI. However, many professionals prefer to retain manual oversight in the fixing process. “Automated troubleshooting can identify and analyze issues, but typically, people want to approve the proposed fixes,” McGillicuddy stated. Many of these capabilities are critical for enhancing security and mitigating threats. Frey emphasized that networking professionals increasingly view AI as a tool to improve organizational security. DeCarlo echoed this sentiment, noting that network managers share similar objectives with security professionals regarding proactive problem recognition. Frey also mentioned alternative use cases for AI, such as documentation and change recommendations, which, while less popular, can offer significant value to network teams. Ultimately, the relevance of any AI capability hinges on its fit within the network environment and team needs. “I don’t think you can prioritize one capability over another,” DeCarlo remarked. “It depends on the tools being used and their effectiveness.” Generative AI: A New Frontier Despite its recent emergence, GenAI has quickly become an asset in the networking field. McGillicuddy noted that in the past year and a half, network professionals have adopted GenAI tools, with ChatGPT being one of the most recognized examples. “One user reported that leveraging ChatGPT could reduce a task that typically takes four hours down to just 10 minutes,” McGillicuddy said. However, he cautioned that users must understand the limitations of GenAI, as mistakes can occur. “There’s a risk of errors or ‘hallucinations’ with these tools, and having blind faith in their outputs can lead to significant network issues,” he warned. In addition to ChatGPT, vendors are developing GenAI interfaces for their products, including virtual assistants. According to McGillicuddy’s findings, common use cases for vendor GenAI products include: DeCarlo added that GenAI tools offer valuable training capabilities due to their rapid processing speeds and in-depth analysis, which can expedite knowledge acquisition within the network. Frey highlighted that GenAI’s rise is attributed to its ability to outperform older systems lacking sophistication. Nevertheless, the complexity of GenAI infrastructures has led to a demand for AIOps tools to manage these systems effectively. “We won’t be able to manage GenAI infrastructures without the support of AI tools, as human capabilities cannot keep pace with rapid changes,” Frey asserted. Challenges in Implementing AI Tools While AI tools present significant benefits for networks, network engineers and managers must navigate several challenges before integration. Data Privacy, Collection, and Quality Data usage remains a critical concern for organizations considering AIOps and GenAI tools. Frey noted that the diverse nature of network data—combining operational information with personally identifiable information—heightens data privacy concerns. For GenAI, McGillicuddy pointed out the importance of validating AI outputs and ensuring high-quality data is utilized for training. “If you feed poor data to a generative AI tool, it will struggle to accurately understand your network,” he explained. Complexity of AI Tools Frey and McGillicuddy agreed that the complexity of both AI and network systems could hinder effective deployment. Frey mentioned that AI systems, especially GenAI, require careful tuning and strong recommendations to minimize inaccuracies. McGillicuddy added that intricate network infrastructures, particularly those involving multiple vendors, could limit the effectiveness of AIOps components, which are often specialized for specific systems. User Uptake and Skills Gaps User adoption of AI tools poses a significant challenge. Proper training is essential to realize the full benefits of AI in networking. Some network professionals may be resistant to using AI, while others may lack the knowledge to integrate these tools effectively. McGillicuddy noted that AIOps tools are often less intuitive than GenAI, necessitating a certain level of expertise for users to extract value. “Understanding how tools function and identifying potential gaps can be challenging,” DeCarlo added. The learning curve can be steep, particularly for teams accustomed to longstanding tools. Integration Issues Integration challenges can further complicate user adoption. McGillicuddy highlighted two dimensions of this issue: tools and processes. On the tools side, concerns arise about harmonizing GenAI with existing systems. “On the process side, it’s crucial to ensure that teams utilize these tools effectively,” he said. DeCarlo cautioned that organizations might need to create in-house supplemental tools to bridge integration gaps, complicating the synchronization of vendor AI

Read More
A Company in Transition

A Company in Transition

OpenAI Restructures: Increased Flexibility, But Raises Concerns OpenAI’s decision to restructure into a for-profit entity offers more freedom for the company and its investors but raises questions about its commitment to ethical AI development. Founded in 2015 as a nonprofit, OpenAI transitioned to a hybrid model in 2019 with the creation of a for-profit subsidiary. Now, its restructuring, widely reported this week, signals a shift where the nonprofit arm will no longer influence the day-to-day operations of the for-profit side. CEO Sam Altman is set to receive equity in the newly restructured company, which will operate as a benefit corporation (B Corp), similar to competitors like Anthropic and Sama. A Company in Transition This move comes on the heels of a turbulent year. OpenAI’s board initially voted to remove Altman over concerns about transparency, but later rehired him after significant backlash and the resignation of several board members. The company has seen a number of high-profile departures since, including co-founder Ilya Sutskever, who left in May to start Safe Superintelligence (SSI), an AI safety-focused venture that recently secured $1 billion in funding. This week, CTO Mira Murati, along with key research leaders Bob McGrew and Barret Zoph, also announced their departures. OpenAI’s restructuring also coincides with an anticipated multi-billion-dollar investment round involving major players such as Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft, potentially pushing the company’s valuation to as high as $150 billion. Complex But Expected Move According to Michael Bennett, AI policy advisor at Northeastern University, the restructuring isn’t surprising given OpenAI’s rapid growth and increasingly complex structure. “Considering OpenAI’s valuation, it’s understandable that the company would simplify its governance to better align with investor priorities,” said Bennett. The transition to a benefit corporation signals a shift towards prioritizing shareholder interests, but it also raises concerns about whether OpenAI will maintain its ethical obligations. “By moving away from its nonprofit roots, OpenAI may scale back its commitment to ethical AI,” Bennett noted. Ethical and Safety Concerns OpenAI has faced scrutiny over its rapid deployment of generative AI models, including its release of ChatGPT in November 2022. Critics, including Elon Musk, have accused the company of failing to be transparent about the data and methods it uses to train its models. Musk, a co-founder of OpenAI, even filed a lawsuit alleging breach of contract. Concerns persist that the restructuring could lead to less ethical oversight, particularly in preventing issues like biased outputs, hallucinations, and broader societal harm from AI. Despite the potential risks, Bennett acknowledged that the company would have greater operational freedom. “They will likely move faster and with greater focus on what benefits their shareholders,” he said. This could come at the expense of the ethical commitments OpenAI previously emphasized when it was a nonprofit. Governance and Regulation Some industry voices, however, argue that OpenAI’s structure shouldn’t dictate its commitment to ethical AI. Veera Siivonen, co-founder and chief commercial officer of AI governance vendor Saidot, emphasized the role of regulation in ensuring responsible AI development. “Major players like Anthropic, Cohere, and tech giants such as Google and Meta are all for-profit entities,” Siivonen said. “It’s unfair to expect OpenAI to operate under a nonprofit model when others in the industry aren’t bound by the same restrictions.” Siivonen also pointed to OpenAI’s participation in global AI governance initiatives. The company recently signed the European Union AI Pact, a voluntary agreement to adhere to the principles of the EU’s AI Act, signaling its commitment to safety and ethics. Challenges for Enterprises The restructuring raises potential concerns for enterprises relying on OpenAI’s technology, said Dion Hinchcliffe, an analyst with Futurum Group. OpenAI may be able to innovate faster under its new structure, but the reduced influence of nonprofit oversight could make some companies question the vendor’s long-term commitment to safety. Hinchcliffe noted that the departure of key staff could signal a shift away from prioritizing AI safety, potentially prompting enterprises to reconsider their trust in OpenAI. New Developments Amid Restructuring Despite the ongoing changes, OpenAI continues to roll out new technologies. The company recently introduced a new moderation model, “omni-moderation-latest,” built on GPT-4o. This model, available through the Moderation API, enables developers to flag harmful content in both text and image outputs. A Company in Transition As OpenAI navigates its restructuring, balancing rapid innovation with maintaining ethical standards will be crucial to sustaining enterprise trust and market leadership. Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Health Cloud Brings Healthcare Transformation Following swiftly after last week’s successful launch of Financial Services Cloud, Salesforce has announced the second installment in its series Read more Top Ten Reasons Why Tectonic Loves the Cloud The Cloud is Good for Everyone – Why Tectonic loves the cloud You don’t need to worry about tracking licenses. Read more

Read More
MCG and Salesforce Health Cloud

MCG and Salesforce Health Cloud

Independent Publisher of Evidence-Based Guidance Integrates with Salesforce Health Cloud to Enhance Chronic Disease Care SEATTLE, Aug. 27, 2024 /PRNewswire-PRWeb/ — MCG Health, a member of the Hearst Health network and a leader in evidence-based clinical guidance, announces a new integration with Salesforce Health Cloud. This partnership aims to improve the management of patients with chronic conditions and those transitioning to different care settings, such as ambulatory care, recovery facilities, or home care. The integration combines Salesforce Health Cloud, the leading AI-powered CRM, with MCG Health’s trusted, evidence-based guidelines to support better patient outcomes. “This integration deepens our collaboration with MCG and delivers greater return on investment for our Health Cloud customers by emphasizing patient-focused and evidence-based disease management,” said Amit Khanna, Senior Vice President and General Manager of Health at Salesforce. Enhanced Care Planning with Salesforce Health Cloud Salesforce Health Cloud’s Integrated Care Management (ICM) feature now incorporates MCG Health’s industry-leading, evidence-based guidelines for Chronic Care and Transitions of Care. This interactive integration simplifies and optimizes care planning for patients’ post-acute journeys. The solution includes tools for identifying patient needs related to social determinants of health (SDOH) and offers branching logic tailored to individual patient situations. This enhancement significantly reduces administrative burdens for hospital and health plan staff while supporting evidence-based care management for populations with chronic conditions and those needing transition management. Additionally, patient education materials from MCG Health can now be easily distributed from within Salesforce Health Cloud, providing patients with enhanced information on their diagnosis and treatment. “MCG’s collaboration with Salesforce Health Cloud provides a powerful, evidence-based tool for managing chronic disease,” said Jon Shreve, President and CEO of MCG Health. “Through this new integration, we can help Salesforce’s healthcare customers streamline their care planning and disease management programs. This solution enhances hospitals’ and health plans’ ability to adhere to evidence-based practices, improving clinical workflows and benefiting both healthcare organizations and, most importantly, patients.” A Strategic Partnership for Better Patient Outcomes “Salesforce is excited to partner with MCG to integrate their trusted, evidence-based guidance into Health Cloud, advancing the care of patients with chronic and complex diseases,” said Amit Khanna, Senior Vice President and General Manager of Health at Salesforce. “This integration strengthens our ongoing collaboration with MCG and delivers more value to our Health Cloud customers by focusing on patient-centered and evidence-based disease management.” Interested parties can request a demo from MCG via this link: Schedule a Demo. About MCG Health MCG Health, part of the Hearst Health network, provides unbiased clinical guidance that empowers healthcare organizations to deliver patient-centered care with confidence. MCG’s AI-driven technology, combined with clinical expertise, enables clients to prioritize and simplify their work. MCG’s world-class customer service ensures clients maximize the benefits of MCG solutions, resulting in improved clinical and financial outcomes. For more information, visit MCG Health. Salesforce, Health Cloud, and related marks are trademarks of Salesforce, Inc. Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more The Salesforce Story In Marc Benioff’s own words How did salesforce.com grow from a start up in a rented apartment into the world’s Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Health Cloud Brings Healthcare Transformation Following swiftly after last week’s successful launch of Financial Services Cloud, Salesforce has announced the second installment in its series Read more

Read More
gettectonic.com