Tokens Archives - gettectonic.com
Shift From AI Agents to AI Agent Tool Use

Building Scalable AI Agents

Building Scalable AI Agents: Infrastructure, Planning, and Security The key building blocks of AI agents—planning, tool integration, and memory—demand sophisticated infrastructure to function effectively in production environments. As the technology advances, several critical components have emerged as essential for successful deployments. Development Frameworks & Architecture The ecosystem for AI agent development has matured, with several key frameworks leading the way: While these frameworks offer unique features, successful agents typically share three core architectural components: Despite these strong foundations, production deployments often require customization to address high-scale workloads, security requirements, and system integrations. Planning & Execution Handling complex tasks requires advanced planning and execution flows, typically structured around: An agent’s effectiveness hinges on its ability to: ✅ Generate structured plans by intelligently combining tools and knowledge (e.g., correctly sequencing API calls for a customer refund request).✅ Validate each task step to prevent errors from compounding.✅ Optimize computational costs in long-running operations.✅ Recover from failures through dynamic replanning.✅ Apply multiple validation strategies, from structural verification to runtime testing.✅ Collaborate with other agents when consensus-based decisions improve accuracy. While multi-agent consensus models improve accuracy, they are computationally expensive. Even OpenAI finds that running parallel model instances for consensus-based responses remains cost-prohibitive, with ChatGPT Pro priced at $200/month. Running majority-vote systems for complex tasks can triple or quintuple costs, making single-agent architectures with robust planning and validation more viable for production use. Memory & Retrieval AI agents require advanced memory management to maintain context and learn from experience. Memory systems typically include: 1. Context Window 2. Working Memory (State Maintained During a Task) Key context management techniques: 3. Long-Term Memory & Knowledge Management AI agents rely on structured storage systems for persistent knowledge: Advanced Memory Capabilities Standardization efforts like Anthropic’s Model Context Protocol (MCP) are emerging to streamline memory integration, but challenges remain in balancing computational efficiency, consistency, and real-time retrieval. Security & Execution As AI agents gain autonomy, security and auditability become critical. Production deployments require multiple layers of protection: 1. Tool Access Control 2. Execution Validation 3. Secure Execution Environments 4. API Governance & Access Control 5. Monitoring & Observability 6. Audit Trails These security measures must balance flexibility, reliability, and operational control to ensure trustworthy AI-driven automation. Conclusion Building production-ready AI agents requires a carefully designed infrastructure that balances:✅ Advanced memory systems for context retention.✅ Sophisticated planning capabilities to break down tasks.✅ Secure execution environments with strong access controls. While AI agents offer immense potential, their adoption remains experimental across industries. Organizations must strategically evaluate where AI agents justify their complexity, ensuring that they provide clear, measurable benefits over traditional AI models. Like1 Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Salesforce Enhances Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Engine Data science and analytics are rapidly becoming standard features in enterprise applications, Read more Health Cloud Brings Healthcare Transformation Following swiftly after last week’s successful launch of Financial Services Cloud, Salesforce has announced the second installment in its series Read more

Read More
is it real or is it gen-r-x

Is it Real or is it Gen-r-X?

The Rise of AI-Generated Content: A Double-Edged Sword It began with a viral deepfake video of a celebrity singing an unexpected tune. Soon, political figures appeared to say things they never uttered. Before long, hyper-realistic AI-generated content flooded the internet, blurring the line between reality and fabrication. While AI-driven creativity unlocks endless possibilities, it also raises an urgent question: How can society discern truth in an era where anything can be convincingly fabricated? Enter SynthID, Google DeepMind’s pioneering solution designed to embed imperceptible watermarks into AI-generated images, offering a reliable method to verify authenticity. What Is SynthID, and Why Does It Matter? At its core, SynthID is an AI-powered watermarking tool that embeds and detects digital signatures in AI-generated images. Unlike traditional watermarks, which can be removed or altered, SynthID’s markers are nearly invisible to the human eye but detectable by specialized AI models. This innovation represents a significant step in combating AI-generated misinformation while preserving the integrity of creative AI applications. How SynthID Works SynthID’s technology operates in two critical phases: This method ensures that even if an image is slightly edited, resized, or filtered, the SynthID watermark remains intact—making it far more resilient than conventional watermarking techniques. SynthID for AI-Generated Text Large language models (LLMs) generate text one token at a time, where each token may represent a single character, word, or part of a phrase. The model predicts the next most likely token based on preceding words and probability scores assigned to potential options. For example, given the phrase “My favorite tropical fruits are __,” an LLM might predict tokens like “mango,” “lychee,” “papaya,” or “durian.” Each token receives a probability score. When multiple viable options exist, SynthID can adjust these probability scores—without compromising output quality—to embed a detectable signature. (Source: DeepMind) SynthID for AI-Generated Music SynthID converts an audio waveform—a one-dimensional representation of sound—into a spectrogram, a two-dimensional visualization of frequency changes over time. The digital watermark is embedded into this spectrogram before being converted back into an audio waveform. This process leverages audio properties to ensure the watermark remains inaudible to humans, preserving the listening experience. The watermark is robust against common modifications such as noise additions, MP3 compression, or tempo changes. SynthID can also scan audio tracks to detect watermarks at different points, helping determine if segments were generated by Lyria, Google’s advanced AI music model. (Source: DeepMind) The Urgent Need for Digital Watermarking in AI AI-generated content is already disrupting multiple industries: In this chaotic landscape, SynthID serves as a digital signature of truth, offering journalists, artists, regulators, and tech companies a crucial tool for transparency. Real-World Impact: How SynthID Is Being Used Today SynthID is already integrated into Google’s Imagen, a text-to-image AI model, and is being tested across industries: By embedding SynthID into digital content pipelines, these industries are fostering an ecosystem where AI-generated media is traceable, reducing misinformation risks. Challenges & Limitations: Is SynthID Foolproof? While groundbreaking, SynthID is not without challenges: Despite these limitations, SynthID lays the foundation for a future where AI-generated content can be reliably traced. The Future of AI Content Verification Google DeepMind’s SynthID is just the beginning. The battle against AI-generated misinformation may involve: As AI reshapes the digital world, tools like SynthID ensure innovation does not come at the cost of authenticity. The Thin Line Between Trust & Deception AI is a powerful tool, but without safeguards, it can become a weapon of misinformation. SynthID represents a bold step toward transparency, helping society navigate the blurred boundaries between real and artificial content. As the technology evolves, businesses, policymakers, and users must embrace solutions like SynthID to ensure AI enhances reality rather than distorting it. The next time an AI-generated image appears, one might ask: Is it real, or does it carry the invisible signature of SynthID? Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Salesforce Enhances Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Engine Data science and analytics are rapidly becoming standard features in enterprise applications, Read more Health Cloud Brings Healthcare Transformation Following swiftly after last week’s successful launch of Financial Services Cloud, Salesforce has announced the second installment in its series Read more

Read More

Reward-Guided Speculative Decoding

Salesforce AI Research Unveils Reward-Guided Speculative Decoding (RSD): A Breakthrough in Large Language Model (LLM) Inference Efficiency Addressing the Computational Challenges of LLMs The rapid scaling of large language models (LLMs) has led to remarkable advancements in natural language understanding and reasoning. However, inference—the process of generating responses one token at a time—remains a major computational bottleneck. As LLMs grow in size and complexity, latency and energy consumption increase, posing challenges for real-world applications that demand cost efficiency, speed, and scalability. Traditional decoding methods, such as greedy and beam search, require repeated evaluations of large models, leading to significant computational overhead. Even parallel decoding techniques struggle to balance efficiency with output quality. These challenges have driven research into hybrid approaches that combine lightweight models with more powerful ones, optimizing speed without sacrificing performance. Introducing Reward-Guided Speculative Decoding (RSD) Salesforce AI Research introduces Reward-Guided Speculative Decoding (RSD), a novel framework designed to enhance LLM inference efficiency. RSD employs a dual-model strategy: Unlike traditional speculative decoding, which enforces strict token matching between draft and target models, RSD introduces a controlled bias that prioritizes high-reward outputs—tokens deemed more accurate or contextually relevant. This strategic bias significantly reduces unnecessary computations. RSD’s mathematically derived threshold mechanism dictates when the target model should intervene. By dynamically blending outputs from both models based on a reward function, RSD accelerates inference while maintaining or even enhancing response quality. This innovation addresses the inefficiencies inherent in sequential token generation for LLMs. Technical Insights and Benefits of RSD RSD integrates two models in a sequential, cooperative manner: This mechanism is guided by a binary step weighting function, ensuring that only high-quality tokens bypass the target model, significantly reducing computational demands. Key Benefits: The theoretical foundation of RSD, including the probabilistic mixture distribution and adaptive acceptance criteria, provides a robust framework for real-world deployment across diverse reasoning tasks. Empirical Results: Superior Performance Across Benchmarks Experiments on challenging datasets—such as GSM8K, MATH500, OlympiadBench, and GPQA—demonstrate RSD’s effectiveness. Notably, on the MATH500 benchmark, RSD achieved 88.0% accuracy using a 72B target model and a 7B PRM, outperforming the target model’s standalone accuracy of 85.6% while reducing FLOPs by nearly 4.4×. These results highlight RSD’s potential to surpass traditional methods, including speculative decoding (SD), beam search, and Best-of-N strategies, in both speed and accuracy. A Paradigm Shift in LLM Inference Reward-Guided Speculative Decoding (RSD) represents a significant advancement in LLM inference. By intelligently combining a draft model with a powerful target model and incorporating a reward-based acceptance criterion, RSD effectively mitigates computational costs without compromising quality. This biased acceleration approach strategically bypasses expensive computations for high-reward outputs, ensuring an efficient and scalable inference process. With empirical results showcasing up to 4.4× faster performance and superior accuracy, RSD sets a new benchmark for hybrid decoding frameworks, paving the way for broader adoption in real-time AI applications. Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more The Salesforce Story In Marc Benioff’s own words How did salesforce.com grow from a start up in a rented apartment into the world’s Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Salesforce Enhances Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Engine Data science and analytics are rapidly becoming standard features in enterprise applications, Read more

Read More
AI Market Heat

AI Market Heat

Alibaba Feels the Heat as DeepSeek Shakes Up AI Market Chinese tech giant Alibaba is under pressure following the release of an AI model by Chinese startup DeepSeek that has sparked a major reaction in the West. DeepSeek claims to have trained its model—comparable to advanced Western AI—at a fraction of the cost and with significantly fewer AI chips. In response, Alibaba launched Qwen 2.5-Max, its latest AI language model, on Tuesday—just one day before the Lunar New Year, when much of China’s economy typically slows down for a 15-day holiday. A Closer Look at Qwen 2.5-Max Qwen 2.5-Max is a Mixture of Experts (MoE) model trained on 20 trillion tokens. It has undergone supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning from human feedback to enhance its capabilities. MoE models function by using multiple specialized “minds,” each focused on a particular domain. When a query is received, the model dynamically routes it to the most relevant expert, improving efficiency. For instance, a coding-related question would be processed by the model’s coding expert. This MoE approach reduces computational requirements, making training more cost-effective and faster. Other AI vendors, such as France-based Mistral AI, have also embraced this technique. DeepSeek’s Disruptive Impact While Qwen 2.5-Max is not a direct competitor to DeepSeek’s R1 model—the release of which triggered a global selloff in AI stocks—it is similar to DeepSeek-V3, another MoE-based model launched earlier this month. Alibaba’s swift release underscores the competitive threat posed by DeepSeek. As the world’s fourth-largest public cloud vendor, Alibaba, along with other Chinese tech giants, has been forced to respond aggressively. In the wake of DeepSeek R1’s debut, ByteDance—the owner of TikTok—also rushed to update its AI offerings. DeepSeek has already disrupted the AI market by significantly undercutting costs. In 2023, the startup introduced V2 at just 1 yuan ($0.14) per million tokens, prompting a price war. By comparison, OpenAI’s GPT-4 starts at $10 per million tokens—a staggering difference. The timing of Alibaba and ByteDance’s latest releases suggests that DeepSeek has accelerated product development cycles across the industry, forcing competitors to move faster than planned. “Alibaba’s cloud unit has been rapidly advancing its AI technology, but the pressure from DeepSeek’s rise is immense,” said Lisa Martin, an analyst at Futurum Group. A Shifting AI Landscape DeepSeek’s rapid growth reflects a broader shift in the AI market—one driven by leaner, more powerful models that challenge conventional approaches. “The drive to build more efficient models continues,” said Gartner analyst Arun Chandrasekaran. “We’re seeing significant innovation in algorithm design and software optimization, allowing AI to run on constrained infrastructure while being more cost-competitive.” This evolution is not happening in isolation. “AI companies are learning from one another, continuously reverse-engineering techniques to create better, cheaper, and more efficient models,” Chandrasekaran added. The AI industry’s perception of cost and scalability has fundamentally changed. Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, previously estimated that training GPT-4 cost over $100 million—but DeepSeek claims it built R1 for just $6 million. “We’ve spent years refining how transformers function, and the efficiency gains we’re seeing now are the result,” said Omdia analyst Bradley Shimmin. “These advances challenge the idea that massive computing power is required to develop state-of-the-art AI.” Competition and Data Controversies DeepSeek’s success showcases the increasing speed at which AI innovation is happening. Its distillation technique, which trains smaller models using insights from larger ones, has allowed it to create powerful AI while keeping costs low. However, OpenAI and Microsoft are now investigating whether DeepSeek improperly used their models’ data to train its own AI—a claim that, if true, could escalate into a major dispute. Ironically, OpenAI itself has faced similar accusations, leading some enterprises to prefer using its models through Microsoft Azure, which offers additional compliance safeguards. “The future of AI development will require stronger security layers,” Shimmin noted. “Enterprises need assurances that using models like Qwen 2.5 or DeepSeek R1 won’t expose their data.” For businesses evaluating AI models, licensing terms matter. Alibaba’s Qwen 2.5 series operates under an Apache 2.0 license, while DeepSeek uses an MIT license—both highly permissive, allowing companies to scrutinize the underlying code and ensure compliance. “These licenses give businesses transparency,” Shimmin explained. “You can vet the code itself, not just the weights, to mitigate privacy and security risks.” The Road Ahead The AI arms race between DeepSeek, Alibaba, OpenAI, and other players is just beginning. As vendors push the limits of efficiency and affordability, competition will likely drive further breakthroughs—and potentially reshape the AI landscape faster than anyone anticipated. Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more The Salesforce Story In Marc Benioff’s own words How did salesforce.com grow from a start up in a rented apartment into the world’s Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Salesforce Enhances Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Engine Data science and analytics are rapidly becoming standard features in enterprise applications, Read more

Read More
Salesforce AI Research Introduces BLIP-3-Video

Salesforce AI Research Introduces BLIP-3-Video

Salesforce AI Research Introduces BLIP-3-Video: A Groundbreaking Multimodal Model for Efficient Video Understanding Vision-language models (VLMs) are transforming artificial intelligence by merging visual and textual data, enabling advancements in video analysis, human-computer interaction, and multimedia applications. These tools empower systems to generate captions, answer questions, and support decision-making, driving innovation in industries like entertainment, healthcare, and autonomous systems. However, the exponential growth in video-based tasks has created a demand for more efficient processing solutions that can manage the vast amounts of visual and temporal data inherent in videos. The Challenge of Scaling Video Understanding Existing video-processing models face significant inefficiencies. Many rely on processing each frame individually, creating thousands of visual tokens that demand extensive computational resources. This approach struggles with long or complex videos, where balancing computational efficiency and accurate temporal understanding becomes crucial. Attempts to address this issue, such as pooling techniques used by models like Video-ChatGPT and LLaVA-OneVision, have only partially succeeded, as they still produce thousands of tokens. Introducing BLIP-3-Video: A Breakthrough in Token Efficiency To tackle these challenges, Salesforce AI Research has developed BLIP-3-Video, a cutting-edge vision-language model optimized for video processing. The key innovation lies in its temporal encoder, which reduces visual tokens to just 16–32 tokens per video, significantly lowering computational requirements while maintaining strong performance. The temporal encoder employs a spatio-temporal attentional pooling mechanism, selectively extracting the most informative data from video frames. By consolidating spatial and temporal information into compact video-level tokens, BLIP-3-Video streamlines video processing without sacrificing accuracy. Efficient Architecture for Scalable Video Tasks BLIP-3-Video’s architecture integrates: This design ensures that the model efficiently captures essential temporal information while minimizing redundant data. Performance Highlights BLIP-3-Video demonstrates remarkable efficiency, achieving accuracy comparable to state-of-the-art models like Tarsier-34B while using a fraction of the tokens: For context, Tarsier-34B requires 4608 tokens for eight video frames, whereas BLIP-3-Video achieves similar results with only 32 tokens. On multiple-choice tasks, the model excelled: These results highlight BLIP-3-Video as one of the most token-efficient models in video understanding, offering top-tier performance while dramatically reducing computational costs. Advancing AI for Real-World Video Applications BLIP-3-Video addresses the critical challenge of token inefficiency, proving that complex video data can be processed effectively with far fewer resources. Developed by Salesforce AI Research, the model paves the way for scalable, real-time video processing across industries, including healthcare, autonomous systems, and entertainment. By combining efficiency with high performance, BLIP-3-Video sets a new standard for vision-language models, driving the practical application of AI in video-based systems. Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more The Salesforce Story In Marc Benioff’s own words How did salesforce.com grow from a start up in a rented apartment into the world’s Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Salesforce Enhances Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Engine Data science and analytics are rapidly becoming standard features in enterprise applications, Read more

Read More
ChatGPT Memory Announced

OpenAI ChatGPT Prompt Guide

Mastering AI Prompting: OpenAI’s Guide to Optimal Model Performance The Art of Effective AI Communication OpenAI has unveiled essential guidelines for optimizing interactions with their reasoning models. As AI systems grow more sophisticated, the quality of user prompts becomes increasingly critical in determining output quality. This guide distills OpenAI’s latest recommendations into actionable strategies for developers, business leaders, and researchers seeking to maximize their AI results. Core Principles for Superior Prompting 1. Clarity Over Complexity Best Practice: Direct, uncomplicated prompts yield better results than convoluted instructions. Example Evolution: Why it works: Modern models possess sophisticated internal reasoning – trust their native capabilities rather than over-scripting the thought process. 2. Rethinking Step-by-Step Instructions New Insight: Explicit “think step by step” prompts often reduce effectiveness rather than enhance it. Example Pair: Pro Tip: For explanations, request the answer first then ask “Explain your calculation” as a follow-up. 3. Structured Inputs with Delimiters For Complex Queries: Use clear visual markers to separate instructions from content. Implementation: markdown Copy Compare these two product descriptions: — [Description A] — [Description B] — Benefit: Reduces misinterpretation by 37% in testing (OpenAI internal data). 4. Precision in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Critical Adjustment: More context ≠ better results. Be surgical with reference materials. Optimal Approach: 5. Constraint-Driven Prompting Formula: Action + Domain + Constraints = Optimal Output Example Progression: 6. Iterative Refinement Process Workflow Strategy: Case Study: Advanced Techniques for Professionals For Developers: python Copy # When implementing RAG systems: optimal_context = filter_documents( query=user_query, relevance_threshold=0.85, max_tokens=1500 ) For Business Analysts: Dashboard Prompt Template:“Identify [X] key trends in [dataset] focusing on [specific metrics]. Format as: 1) Trend 2) Business Impact 3) Recommended Action” For Researchers: “Critique this methodology [paste abstract] focusing on: 1) Sample size adequacy 2) Potential confounding variables 3) Statistical power considerations” Performance Benchmarks Prompt Style Accuracy Score Response Time Basic 72% 1.2s Optimized 89% 0.8s Over-engineered 65% 2.1s Implementation Checklist The Future of Prompt Engineering As models evolve, expect: Final Recommendation: Regularly revisit prompting strategies as model capabilities progress. What works today may become suboptimal in future iterations. Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more The Salesforce Story In Marc Benioff’s own words How did salesforce.com grow from a start up in a rented apartment into the world’s Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Salesforce Enhances Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Engine Data science and analytics are rapidly becoming standard features in enterprise applications, Read more

Read More

Why Build a General-Purpose Agent?

A general-purpose LLM agent serves as an excellent starting point for prototyping use cases and establishing the foundation for a custom agentic architecture tailored to your needs. What is an LLM Agent? An LLM (Large Language Model) agent is a program where execution logic is governed by the underlying model. Unlike approaches such as few-shot prompting or fixed workflows, LLM agents adapt dynamically. They can determine which tools to use (e.g., web search or code execution), how to use them, and iterate based on results. This adaptability enables handling diverse tasks with minimal configuration. Agentic Architectures Explained:Agentic systems range from the reliability of fixed workflows to the flexibility of autonomous agents. For instance: Your architecture choice will depend on the desired balance between reliability and flexibility for your use case. Building a General-Purpose LLM Agent Step 1: Select the Right LLM Choosing the right model is critical for performance. Evaluate based on: Model Recommendations (as of now): For simpler use cases, smaller models running locally can also be effective, but with limited functionality. Step 2: Define the Agent’s Control Logic The system prompt differentiates an LLM agent from a standalone model. This prompt contains rules, instructions, and structures that guide the agent’s behavior. Common Agentic Patterns: Starting with ReAct or Plan-then-Execute patterns is recommended for general-purpose agents. Step 3: Define the Agent’s Core Instructions To optimize the agent’s behavior, clearly define its features and constraints in the system prompt: Example Instructions: Step 4: Define and Optimize Core Tools Tools expand an agent’s capabilities. Common tools include: For each tool, define: Example: Implementing an Arxiv API tool for scientific queries. Step 5: Memory Handling Strategy Since LLMs have limited memory (context window), a strategy is necessary to manage past interactions. Common approaches include: For personalization, long-term memory can store user preferences or critical information. Step 6: Parse the Agent’s Output To make raw LLM outputs actionable, implement a parser to convert outputs into a structured format like JSON. Structured outputs simplify execution and ensure consistency. Step 7: Orchestrate the Agent’s Workflow Define orchestration logic to handle the agent’s next steps after receiving an output: Example Orchestration Code: pythonCopy codedef orchestrator(llm_agent, llm_output, tools, user_query): while True: action = llm_output.get(“action”) if action == “tool_call”: tool_name = llm_output.get(“tool_name”) tool_params = llm_output.get(“tool_params”, {}) if tool_name in tools: try: tool_result = tools[tool_name](**tool_params) llm_output = llm_agent({“tool_output”: tool_result}) except Exception as e: return f”Error executing tool ‘{tool_name}’: {str(e)}” else: return f”Error: Tool ‘{tool_name}’ not found.” elif action == “return_answer”: return llm_output.get(“answer”, “No answer provided.”) else: return “Error: Unrecognized action type from LLM output.” This orchestration ensures seamless interaction between tools, memory, and user queries. When to Consider Multi-Agent Systems A single-agent setup works well for prototyping but may hit limits with complex workflows or extensive toolsets. Multi-agent architectures can: Starting with a single agent helps refine workflows, identify bottlenecks, and scale effectively. By following these steps, you’ll have a versatile system capable of handling diverse use cases, from competitive analysis to automating workflows. Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Salesforce Enhances Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Engine Data science and analytics are rapidly becoming standard features in enterprise applications, Read more Health Cloud Brings Healthcare Transformation Following swiftly after last week’s successful launch of Financial Services Cloud, Salesforce has announced the second installment in its series Read more

Read More
MOIRAI-MoE

MOIRAI-MoE

MOIRAI-MoE represents a groundbreaking advancement in time series forecasting by introducing a flexible, data-driven approach that addresses the limitations of traditional models. Its sparse mixture of experts architecture achieves token-level specialization, offering significant performance improvements and computational efficiency. By dynamically adapting to the unique characteristics of time series data, MOIRAI-MoE sets a new standard for foundation models, paving the way for future innovations and expanding the potential of zero-shot forecasting across diverse industries.

Read More
Google’s Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B

Google’s Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B

Google’s Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B: A Game-Changer in Speed and Affordability Google’s latest AI model, Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B, has taken the spotlight as the company’s fastest and most cost-effective offering to date. Building on the foundation of the original Flash model, 8B introduces key upgrades in pricing, speed, and rate limits, signaling Google’s intent to dominate the affordable AI model market. What Sets Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B Apart? Google has implemented several enhancements to this lightweight model, informed by “developer feedback and testing the limits of what’s possible,” as highlighted in their announcement. These updates focus on three major areas: 1. Unprecedented Price Reduction The cost of using Flash-8B has been slashed in half compared to its predecessor, making it the most budget-friendly model in its class. This dramatic price drop solidifies Flash-8B as a leading choice for developers seeking an affordable yet reliable AI solution. 2. Enhanced Speed The Flash-8B model is 40% faster than its closest competitor, GPT-4o, according to data from Artificial Analysis. This improvement underscores Google’s focus on speed as a critical feature for developers. Whether working in AI Studio or using the Gemini API, users will notice shorter response times and smoother interactions. 3. Increased Rate Limits Flash-8B doubles the rate limits of its predecessor, allowing for 4,000 requests per minute. This improvement ensures developers and users can handle higher volumes of smaller, faster tasks without bottlenecks, enhancing efficiency in real-time applications. Accessing Flash-8B You can start using Flash-8B today through Google AI Studio or via the Gemini API. AI Studio provides a free testing environment, making it a great starting point before transitioning to API integration for larger-scale projects. Comparing Flash-8B to Other Gemini Models Flash-8B positions itself as a faster, cheaper alternative to high-performance models like Gemini 1.5 Pro. While it doesn’t outperform the Pro model across all benchmarks, it excels in cost efficiency and speed, making it ideal for tasks requiring rapid processing at scale. In benchmark evaluations, Flash-8B surpasses the base Flash model in four key areas, with only marginal decreases in other metrics. For developers prioritizing speed and affordability, Flash-8B offers a compelling balance between performance and cost. Why Flash-8B Matters Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B highlights Google’s commitment to providing accessible AI solutions for developers without compromising on quality. With its reduced costs, faster response times, and higher request limits, Flash-8B is poised to redefine expectations for lightweight AI models, catering to a broad spectrum of applications while maintaining an edge in affordability. Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more The Salesforce Story In Marc Benioff’s own words How did salesforce.com grow from a start up in a rented apartment into the world’s Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Salesforce Enhances Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Engine Data science and analytics are rapidly becoming standard features in enterprise applications, Read more

Read More
Where LLMs Fall Short

LLM Economies

Throughout history, disruptive technologies have been the catalyst for major social and economic revolutions. The invention of the plow and irrigation systems 12,000 years ago sparked the Agricultural Revolution, while Johannes Gutenberg’s 15th-century printing press fueled the Protestant Reformation and helped propel Europe out of the Middle Ages into the Renaissance. In the 18th century, James Watt’s steam engine ushered in the Industrial Revolution. More recently, the internet has revolutionized communication, commerce, and information access, shrinking the world into a global village. Similarly, smartphones have transformed how people interact with their surroundings. Now, we stand at the dawn of the AI revolution. Large Language Models (LLMs) represent a monumental leap forward, with significant economic implications at both macro and micro levels. These models are reshaping global markets, driving new forms of currency, and creating a novel economic landscape. The reason LLMs are transforming industries and redefining economies is simple: they automate both routine and complex tasks that traditionally require human intelligence. They enhance decision-making processes, boost productivity, and facilitate cost reductions across various sectors. This enables organizations to allocate human resources toward more creative and strategic endeavors, resulting in the development of new products and services. From healthcare to finance to customer service, LLMs are creating new markets and driving AI-driven services like content generation and conversational assistants into the mainstream. To truly grasp the engine driving this new global economy, it’s essential to understand the inner workings of this disruptive technology. These posts will provide both a macro-level overview of the economic forces at play and a deep dive into the technical mechanics of LLMs, equipping you with a comprehensive understanding of the revolution happening now. Why Now? The Connection Between Language and Human Intelligence AI did not begin with ChatGPT’s arrival in November 2022. Many people were developing machine learning classification models in 1999, and the roots of AI go back even further. Artificial Intelligence was formally born in 1950, when Alan Turing—considered the father of theoretical computer science and famed for cracking the Nazi Enigma code during World War II—created the first formal definition of intelligence. This definition, known as the Turing Test, demonstrated the potential for machines to exhibit human-like intelligence through natural language conversations. The test involves a human evaluator who engages in conversations with both a human and a machine. If the evaluator cannot reliably distinguish between the two, the machine is considered to have passed the test. Remarkably, after 72 years of gradual AI development, ChatGPT simulated this very interaction, passing the Turing Test and igniting the current AI explosion. But why is language so closely tied to human intelligence, rather than, for example, vision? While 70% of our brain’s neurons are devoted to vision, OpenAI’s pioneering image generation model, DALL-E, did not trigger the same level of excitement as ChatGPT. The answer lies in the profound role language has played in human evolution. The Evolution of Language The development of language was the turning point in humanity’s rise to dominance on Earth. As Yuval Noah Harari points out in his book Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind, it was the ability to gossip and discuss abstract concepts that set humans apart from other species. Complex communication, such as gossip, requires a shared, sophisticated language. Human language evolved from primitive cave signs to structured alphabets, which, along with grammar rules, created languages capable of expressing thousands of words. In today’s digital age, language has further evolved with the inclusion of emojis, and now with the advent of GenAI, tokens have become the latest cornerstone in this progression. These shifts highlight the extraordinary journey of human language, from simple symbols to intricate digital representations. In the next post, we will explore the intricacies of LLMs, focusing specifically on tokens. But before that, let’s delve into the economic forces shaping the LLM-driven world. The Forces Shaping the LLM Economy AI Giants in Competition Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels argued that those who control the means of production hold power. The tech giants of today understand that AI is the future means of production, and the race to dominate the LLM market is well underway. This competition is fierce, with industry leaders like OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, and Facebook battling for supremacy. New challengers such as Mistral (France), AI21 (Israel), and Elon Musk’s xAI and Anthropic are also entering the fray. The LLM industry is expanding exponentially, with billions of dollars of investment pouring in. For example, Anthropic has raised $4.5 billion from 43 investors, including major players like Amazon, Google, and Microsoft. The Scarcity of GPUs Just as Bitcoin mining requires vast computational resources, training LLMs demands immense computing power, driving a search for new energy sources. Microsoft’s recent investment in nuclear energy underscores this urgency. At the heart of LLM technology are Graphics Processing Units (GPUs), essential for powering deep neural networks. These GPUs have become scarce and expensive, adding to the competitive tension. Tokens: The New Currency of the LLM Economy Tokens are the currency driving the emerging AI economy. Just as money facilitates transactions in traditional markets, tokens are the foundation of LLM economics. But what exactly are tokens? Tokens are the basic units of text that LLMs process. They can be single characters, parts of words, or entire words. For example, the word “Oscar” might be split into two tokens, “os” and “car.” The performance of LLMs—quality, speed, and cost—hinges on how efficiently they generate these tokens. LLM providers price their services based on token usage, with different rates for input (prompt) and output (completion) tokens. As companies rely more on LLMs, especially for complex tasks like agentic applications, token usage will significantly impact operational costs. With fierce competition and the rise of open-source models like Llama-3.1, the cost of tokens is rapidly decreasing. For instance, OpenAI reduced its GPT-4 pricing by about 80% over the past year and a half. This trend enables companies to expand their portfolio of AI-powered products, further fueling the LLM economy. Context Windows: Expanding Capabilities

Read More
Snowflake Security and Development

Snowflake Security and Development

Snowflake Unveils AI Development and Enhanced Security Features At its annual Build virtual developer conference, Snowflake introduced a suite of new capabilities focused on AI development and strengthened security measures. These enhancements aim to simplify the creation of conversational AI tools, improve collaboration, and address data security challenges following a significant breach earlier this year. AI Development Updates Snowflake announced updates to its Cortex AI suite to streamline the development of conversational AI applications. These new tools focus on enabling faster, more efficient development while ensuring data integrity and trust. Highlights include: These features address enterprise demands for generative AI tools that boost productivity while maintaining governance over proprietary data. Snowflake aims to eliminate barriers to data-driven decision-making by enabling natural language queries and easy integration of structured and unstructured data into AI models. According to Christian Kleinerman, Snowflake’s EVP of Product, the goal is to reduce the time it takes for developers to build reliable, cost-effective AI applications: “We want to help customers build conversational applications for structured and unstructured data faster and more efficiently.” Security Enhancements Following a breach last May, where hackers accessed customer data via stolen login credentials, Snowflake has implemented new security features: These additions come alongside existing tools like the Horizon Catalog for data governance. Kleinerman noted that while Snowflake’s previous security measures were effective at preventing unauthorized access, the company recognizes the need to improve user adoption of these tools: “It’s on us to ensure our customers can fully leverage the security capabilities we offer. That’s why we’re adding more monitoring, insights, and recommendations.” Collaboration Features Snowflake is also enhancing collaboration through its new Internal Marketplace, which enables organizations to share data, AI tools, and applications across business units. The Native App Framework now integrates with Snowpark Container Services to simplify the distribution and monetization of analytics and AI products. AI Governance and Competitive Position Industry analysts highlight the growing importance of AI governance as enterprises increasingly adopt generative AI tools. David Menninger of ISG’s Ventana Research emphasized that Snowflake’s governance-focused features, such as LLM observability, fill a critical gap in AI tooling: “Trustworthy AI enhancements like model explainability and observability are vital as enterprises scale their use of AI.” With these updates, Snowflake continues to compete with Databricks and other vendors. Its strategy focuses on offering both API-based flexibility for developers and built-in tools for users seeking simpler solutions. By combining innovative AI development tools with robust security and collaboration features, Snowflake aims to meet the evolving needs of enterprises while positioning itself as a leader in the data platform and AI space. Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Salesforce Enhances Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Engine Data science and analytics are rapidly becoming standard features in enterprise applications, Read more Health Cloud Brings Healthcare Transformation Following swiftly after last week’s successful launch of Financial Services Cloud, Salesforce has announced the second installment in its series Read more

Read More
Where LLMs Fall Short

Where LLMs Fall Short

Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed natural language processing, showcasing exceptional abilities in text generation, translation, and various language tasks. Models like GPT-4, BERT, and T5 are based on transformer architectures, which enable them to predict the next word in a sequence by training on vast text datasets. How LLMs Function LLMs process input text through multiple layers of attention mechanisms, capturing complex relationships between words and phrases. Here’s an overview of the process: Tokenization and Embedding Initially, the input text is broken down into smaller units, typically words or subwords, through tokenization. Each token is then converted into a numerical representation known as an embedding. For instance, the sentence “The cat sat on the mat” could be tokenized into [“The”, “cat”, “sat”, “on”, “the”, “mat”], each assigned a unique vector. Multi-Layer Processing The embedded tokens are passed through multiple transformer layers, each containing self-attention mechanisms and feed-forward neural networks. Contextual Understanding As the input progresses through layers, the model develops a deeper understanding of the text, capturing both local and global context. This enables the model to comprehend relationships such as: Training and Pattern Recognition During training, LLMs are exposed to vast datasets, learning patterns related to grammar, syntax, and semantics: Generating Responses When generating text, the LLM predicts the next word or token based on its learned patterns. This process is iterative, where each generated token influences the next. For example, if prompted with “The Eiffel Tower is located in,” the model would likely generate “Paris,” given its learned associations between these terms. Limitations in Reasoning and Planning Despite their capabilities, LLMs face challenges in areas like reasoning and planning. Research by Subbarao Kambhampati highlights several limitations: Lack of Causal Understanding LLMs struggle with causal reasoning, which is crucial for understanding how events and actions relate in the real world. Difficulty with Multi-Step Planning LLMs often struggle to break down tasks into a logical sequence of actions. Blocksworld Problem Kambhampati’s research on the Blocksworld problem, which involves stacking and unstacking blocks, shows that LLMs like GPT-3 struggle with even simple planning tasks. When tested on 600 Blocksworld instances, GPT-3 solved only 12.5% of them using natural language prompts. Even after fine-tuning, the model solved only 20% of the instances, highlighting the model’s reliance on pattern recognition rather than true understanding of the planning task. Performance on GPT-4 Temporal and Counterfactual Reasoning LLMs also struggle with temporal reasoning (e.g., understanding the sequence of events) and counterfactual reasoning (e.g., constructing hypothetical scenarios). Token and Numerical Errors LLMs also exhibit errors in numerical reasoning due to inconsistencies in tokenization and their lack of true numerical understanding. Tokenization and Numerical Representation Numbers are often tokenized inconsistently. For example, “380” might be one token, while “381” might split into two tokens (“38” and “1”), leading to confusion in numerical interpretation. Decimal Comparison Errors LLMs can struggle with decimal comparisons. For example, comparing 9.9 and 9.11 may result in incorrect conclusions due to how the model processes these numbers as strings rather than numerically. Examples of Numerical Errors Hallucinations and Biases Hallucinations LLMs are prone to generating false or nonsensical content, known as hallucinations. This can happen when the model produces irrelevant or fabricated information. Biases LLMs can perpetuate biases present in their training data, which can lead to the generation of biased or stereotypical content. Inconsistencies and Context Drift LLMs often struggle to maintain consistency over long sequences of text or tasks. As the input grows, the model may prioritize more recent information, leading to contradictions or neglect of earlier context. This is particularly problematic in multi-turn conversations or tasks requiring persistence. Conclusion While LLMs have advanced the field of natural language processing, they still face significant challenges in reasoning, planning, and maintaining contextual accuracy. These limitations highlight the need for further research and development of hybrid AI systems that integrate LLMs with other techniques to improve reasoning, consistency, and overall performance. Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Salesforce Enhances Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Engine Data science and analytics are rapidly becoming standard features in enterprise applications, Read more Health Cloud Brings Healthcare Transformation Following swiftly after last week’s successful launch of Financial Services Cloud, Salesforce has announced the second installment in its series Read more

Read More
  • 1
  • 2
gettectonic.com