LangGraph Archives - gettectonic.com
Data Governance for the AI Enterprise

A Strategic Approach to Governing Enterprise AI Systems

The Imperative of AI Governance in Modern Enterprises Effective data governance is widely acknowledged as a critical component of deploying enterprise AI applications. However, translating governance principles into actionable strategies remains a complex challenge. This article presents a structured approach to AI governance, offering foundational principles that organizations can adapt to their needs. While not exhaustive, this framework provides a starting point for managing AI systems responsibly. Defining Data Governance in the AI Era At its core, data governance encompasses the policies and processes that dictate how organizations manage data—ensuring proper storage, access, and usage. Two key roles facilitate governance: Traditional data systems operate within deterministic governance frameworks, where structured schemas and well-defined hierarchies enable clear rule enforcement. However, AI introduces non-deterministic challenges—unstructured data, probabilistic decision-making, and evolving models—requiring a more adaptive governance approach. Core Principles for Effective AI Governance To navigate these complexities, organizations should adopt the following best practices: Multi-Agent Architectures: A Governance Enabler Modern AI applications should embrace agent-based architectures, where multiple AI models collaborate to accomplish tasks. This approach draws from decades of distributed systems and microservices best practices, ensuring scalability and maintainability. Key developments facilitating this shift include: By treating AI agents as modular components, organizations can apply service-oriented governance principles, improving oversight and adaptability. Deterministic vs. Non-Deterministic Governance Models Traditional (Deterministic) Governance AI (Non-Deterministic) Governance Interestingly, human governance has long managed non-deterministic actors (people), offering valuable lessons for AI oversight. Legal systems, for instance, incorporate checks and balances—acknowledging human fallibility while maintaining societal stability. Mitigating AI Hallucinations Through Specialization Large language models (LLMs) are prone to hallucinations—generating plausible but incorrect responses. Mitigation strategies include: This mirrors real-world expertise—just as a medical specialist provides domain-specific advice, AI agents should operate within bounded competencies. Adversarial Validation for AI Governance Inspired by Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), AI governance can employ: This adversarial dynamic improves quality over time, much like auditing processes in human systems. Knowledge Management: The Backbone of AI Governance Enterprise knowledge is often fragmented, residing in: To govern this effectively, organizations should: Ethics, Safety, and Responsible AI Deployment AI ethics remains a nuanced challenge due to: Best practices include: Conclusion: Toward Responsible and Scalable AI Governance AI governance demands a multi-layered approach, blending:✔ Technical safeguards (specialized agents, adversarial validation).✔ Process rigor (knowledge certification, human oversight).✔ Ethical foresight (bias mitigation, risk-aware automation). By learning from both software engineering and human governance paradigms, enterprises can build AI systems that are effective, accountable, and aligned with organizational values. The path forward requires continuous refinement, but with strategic governance, AI can drive innovation while minimizing unintended consequences. Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more The Salesforce Story In Marc Benioff’s own words How did salesforce.com grow from a start up in a rented apartment into the world’s Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Salesforce Enhances Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Engine Data science and analytics are rapidly becoming standard features in enterprise applications, Read more

Read More
Learning AI

The Open-Source Agent Framework Landscape

The Open-Source Agent Framework Landscape: Beyond CrewAI & AutoGen The AI agent ecosystem has exploded with new frameworks—each offering unique approaches to building autonomous systems. While CrewAI and AutoGen dominate discussions, alternatives like LangGraph, Agno, SmolAgents, Mastra, PydanticAI, and Atomic Agents are gaining traction. Here’s a breakdown of how they compare, their design philosophies, and which might be right for your use case. What Do Agent Frameworks Actually Do? Agentic AI frameworks help structure LLM workflows by handling:✅ Prompt engineering (formatting inputs/outputs)✅ Tool routing (API calls, RAG, function execution)✅ State management (short-term memory)✅ Multi-agent orchestration (collaboration & hierarchies) At their core, they abstract away the manual work of: But too much abstraction can backfire—some developers end up rewriting parts of frameworks (like LangGraph’s create_react_agent) for finer control. The Frameworks Compared 1. The Big Players: CrewAI & AutoGen Framework Best For Key Differentiator CrewAI Quick prototyping High abstraction, hides low-level details AutoGen Research/testing Asynchronous, agent-driven collaboration CrewAI lets you spin up agents fast but can be opaque when debugging. AutoGen excels in freeform agent teamwork but may lack structure for production use. 2. The Rising Stars Framework Philosophy Strengths Weaknesses LangGraph Graph-based workflows Fine-grained control, scalable multi-agent Steep learning curve Agno (ex-Phi-Data) Developer experience Clean docs, plug-and-play Newer, fewer examples SmolAgents Minimalist Code-based routing, Hugging Face integration Limited scalability Mastra (JS) Frontend-friendly Built for web devs Less backend flexibility PydanticAI Type-safe control Predictable outputs, easy debugging Manual orchestration Atomic Agents Lego-like modularity Explicit control, no black boxes More coding required Key Differences in Approach 1. Abstraction Level 2. Agency vs. Control 3. Multi-Agent Support What’s Missing? Not all frameworks handle:🔹 Multimodality (images/audio)🔹 Long-term memory (beyond session state)🔹 Enterprise scalability (LangGraph leads here) Which One Should You Choose? Use Case Recommended Framework Quick prototyping CrewAI, Agno Research/experiments AutoGen, SmolAgents Production multi-agent LangGraph, PydanticAI Strict control & debugging Atomic Agents, PydanticAI Frontend integration Mastra For beginners: Start with Agno or CrewAI.For engineers: LangGraph or PydanticAI offer the most flexibility. Final Thoughts The “best” framework depends on your needs: While some argue these frameworks overcomplicate what SDKs already do, they’re invaluable for scaling agent systems. The space is evolving fast—expect more consolidation and innovation ahead. Try a few, see what clicks, and build something awesome!  l Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more The Salesforce Story In Marc Benioff’s own words How did salesforce.com grow from a start up in a rented apartment into the world’s Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Salesforce Enhances Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Engine Data science and analytics are rapidly becoming standard features in enterprise applications, Read more

Read More
AI Agents and Work

From AI Workflows to Autonomous Agents

From AI Workflows to Autonomous Agents: The Path to True AI Autonomy Building functional AI agents is often portrayed as a straightforward task—chain a large language model (LLM) to some APIs, add memory, and declare autonomy. Yet, anyone who has deployed such systems in production knows the reality: agents that perform well in controlled demos often falter in the real world, making poor decisions, entering infinite loops, or failing entirely when faced with unanticipated scenarios. AI Workflows vs. AI Agents: Key Differences The distinction between workflows and agents, as highlighted by Anthropic and LangGraph, is critical. Workflows dominate because they work reliably. But to achieve true agentic AI, the field must overcome fundamental challenges in reasoning, adaptability, and robustness. The Evolution of AI Workflows 1. Prompt Chaining: Structured but Fragile Breaking tasks into sequential subtasks improves accuracy by enforcing step-by-step validation. However, this approach introduces latency, cascading failures, and sometimes leads to verbose but incorrect reasoning. 2. Routing Frameworks: Efficiency with Blind Spots Directing tasks to specialized models (e.g., math to a math-optimized LLM) enhances efficiency. Yet, LLMs struggle with self-assessment—they often attempt tasks beyond their capabilities, leading to confident but incorrect outputs. 3. Parallel Processing: Speed at the Cost of Coherence Running multiple subtasks simultaneously speeds up workflows, but merging conflicting results remains a challenge. Without robust synthesis mechanisms, parallelization can produce inconsistent or nonsensical outputs. 4. Orchestrator-Worker Models: Flexibility Within Limits A central orchestrator delegates tasks to specialized components, enabling scalable multi-step problem-solving. However, the system remains bound by predefined logic—true adaptability is still missing. 5. Evaluator-Optimizer Loops: Limited by Feedback Quality These loops refine performance based on evaluator feedback. But if the evaluation metric is flawed, optimization merely entrenches errors rather than correcting them. The Four Pillars of True Autonomous Agents For AI to move beyond workflows and achieve genuine autonomy, four critical challenges must be addressed: 1. Self-Awareness Current agents lack the ability to recognize uncertainty, reassess faulty reasoning, or know when to halt execution. A functional agent must self-monitor and adapt in real-time to avoid compounding errors. 2. Explainability Workflows are debuggable because each step is predefined. Autonomous agents, however, require transparent decision-making—they should justify their reasoning at every stage, enabling developers to diagnose and correct failures. 3. Security Granting agents API access introduces risks beyond content moderation. True agent security requires architectural safeguards that prevent harmful or unintended actions before execution. 4. Scalability While workflows scale predictably, autonomous agents become unstable as complexity grows. Solving this demands more than bigger models—it requires agents that handle novel scenarios without breaking. The Road Ahead: Beyond the Hype Today’s “AI agents” are largely advanced workflows masquerading as autonomous systems. Real progress won’t come from larger LLMs or longer context windows, but from agents that can:✔ Detect and correct their own mistakes✔ Explain their reasoning transparently✔ Operate securely in open environments✔ Scale intelligently to unforeseen challenges The shift from workflows to true agents is closer than it seems—but only if the focus remains on real decision-making, not just incremental automation improvements. Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more The Salesforce Story In Marc Benioff’s own words How did salesforce.com grow from a start up in a rented apartment into the world’s Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Salesforce Enhances Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Engine Data science and analytics are rapidly becoming standard features in enterprise applications, Read more

Read More
designing ai agents the right way

Designing AI Agents the Right Way

Designing AI agents effectively involves a structured approach, starting with defining clear objectives and aligning them with business needs. It also requires careful data collection and preparation, selecting the right machine learning models, and crafting a robust architecture. Finally, building in feedback loops and prioritizing continuous monitoring and improvement are crucial for success.  Here’s a more detailed breakdown: 1. Define Objectives and Purpose: 2. Data Collection and Preparation: 3. Choose the Right Models and Tools: 4. Design the Agent Architecture: 5. Training and Refinement: 6. Testing and Validation: 7. Deployment, Monitoring, and Iteration: 8. Key Considerations: By following these principles, you can design AI agents that are not only effective but also robust, scalable, and aligned with your business objectives. Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more The Salesforce Story In Marc Benioff’s own words How did salesforce.com grow from a start up in a rented apartment into the world’s Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Salesforce Enhances Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Engine Data science and analytics are rapidly becoming standard features in enterprise applications, Read more

Read More
Large and Small Language Models

Architecture for Enterprise-Grade Agentic AI Systems

LangGraph: The Architecture for Enterprise-Grade Agentic AI Systems Modern enterprises need AI that doesn’t just answer questions—but thinks, plans, and acts autonomously. LangGraph provides the framework to build these next-generation agentic systems capable of: ✅ Multi-step reasoning across complex workflows✅ Dynamic decision-making with real-time tool selection✅ Stateful execution that maintains context across operations✅ Seamless integration with enterprise knowledge bases and APIs 1. LangGraph’s Graph-Based Architecture At its core, LangGraph models AI workflows as Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs): This structure enables:✔ Conditional branching (different paths based on data)✔ Parallel processing where possible✔ Guaranteed completion (no infinite loops) Example Use Case:A customer service agent that: 2. Multi-Hop Knowledge Retrieval Enterprise queries often require connecting information across multiple sources. LangGraph treats this as a graph traversal problem: python Copy # Neo4j integration for structured knowledge from langchain.graphs import Neo4jGraph graph = Neo4jGraph(url=”bolt://localhost:7687″, username=”neo4j”, password=”password”) query = “”” MATCH (doc:Document)-[:REFERENCES]->(policy:Policy) WHERE policy.name = ‘GDPR’ RETURN doc.title, doc.url “”” results = graph.query(query) # → Feeds into LangGraph nodes Hybrid Approach: 3. Building Autonomous Agents LangGraph + LangChain agents create systems that: python Copy from langchain.agents import initialize_agent, Tool from langchain.chat_models import ChatOpenAI # Define tools search_tool = Tool( name=”ProductSearch”, func=search_product_db, description=”Searches internal product catalog” ) # Initialize agent agent = initialize_agent( tools=[search_tool], llm=ChatOpenAI(model=”gpt-4″), agent=AgentType.ZERO_SHOT_REACT_DESCRIPTION ) # Execute response = agent.run(“Find compatible accessories for Model X-42”) 4. Full Implementation Example Enterprise Document Processing System: python Copy from langgraph.graph import StateGraph from langchain.embeddings import OpenAIEmbeddings from langchain.vectorstores import Pinecone # 1. Define shared state class DocProcessingState(BaseModel): query: str retrieved_docs: list = [] analysis: str = “” actions: list = [] # 2. Create nodes def retrieve(state): vectorstore = Pinecone.from_existing_index(“docs”, OpenAIEmbeddings()) state.retrieved_docs = vectorstore.similarity_search(state.query) return state def analyze(state): # LLM analysis of documents state.analysis = llm(f”Summarize key points from: {state.retrieved_docs}”) return state # 3. Build workflow workflow = StateGraph(DocProcessingState) workflow.add_node(“retrieve”, retrieve) workflow.add_node(“analyze”, analyze) workflow.add_edge(“retrieve”, “analyze”) workflow.add_edge(“analyze”, END) # 4. Execute agent = workflow.compile() result = agent.invoke({“query”: “2025 compliance changes”}) Why This Matters for Enterprises The Future:LangGraph enables AI systems that don’t just assist workers—but autonomously execute complete business processes while adhering to organizational rules and structures. “This isn’t chatbot AI—it’s digital workforce AI.” Next Steps: Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more The Salesforce Story In Marc Benioff’s own words How did salesforce.com grow from a start up in a rented apartment into the world’s Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Salesforce Enhances Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Engine Data science and analytics are rapidly becoming standard features in enterprise applications, Read more

Read More
Google and Salesforce Expand Partnership

Google Unveils Agent2Agent (A2A)

Google Unveils Agent2Agent (A2A): An Open Protocol for AI Agents to Collaborate Directly Google has introduced the Agent2Agent Protocol (A2A), a new open standard that enables AI agents to communicate and collaborate seamlessly—regardless of their underlying framework, developer, or deployment environment. If the Model Context Protocol (MCP) gave agents a structured way to interact with tools, A2A takes it a step further by allowing them to work together as a team. This marks a significant step toward standardizing how autonomous AI systems operate in real-world scenarios. Key Highlights: How A2A Works Think of A2A as a universal language for AI agents—it defines how they: Crucially, A2A is designed for enterprise use from the ground up, with built-in support for:✔ Authentication & security✔ Push notifications & streaming updates✔ Human-in-the-loop workflows Why This Matters A2A could do for AI agents what HTTP did for the web—eliminating vendor lock-in and enabling businesses to mix-and-match agents across HR, CRM, and supply chain systems without custom integrations. Google likens the relationship between A2A and MCP to mechanics working on a car: Designed for Enterprise Security & Flexibility A2A supports opaque agents (those that don’t expose internal logic), making it ideal for secure, modular enterprise deployments. Instead of syncing internal states, agents share context via structured “Tasks”, which include: Communication happens via standard formats like HTTP, JSON-RPC, and SSE for real-time streaming. Available Now—With More to Come The initial open-source spec is live on GitHub, with SDKs, sample agents, and integrations for frameworks like: Google is inviting community contributions ahead of a production-ready 1.0 release later this year. The Bigger Picture If A2A gains widespread adoption—as its strong early backing suggests—it could accelerate the AI agent ecosystem much like Kubernetes did for cloud apps or OAuth for secure access. By solving interoperability at the protocol level, A2A paves the way for businesses to deploy a cohesive digital workforce composed of diverse, specialized agents. For enterprises future-proofing their AI strategy, A2A is a development worth watching closely. Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more The Salesforce Story In Marc Benioff’s own words How did salesforce.com grow from a start up in a rented apartment into the world’s Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Salesforce Enhances Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Engine Data science and analytics are rapidly becoming standard features in enterprise applications, Read more

Read More
Shift From AI Agents to AI Agent Tool Use

Building Scalable AI Agents

Building Scalable AI Agents: Infrastructure, Planning, and Security The key building blocks of AI agents—planning, tool integration, and memory—demand sophisticated infrastructure to function effectively in production environments. As the technology advances, several critical components have emerged as essential for successful deployments. Development Frameworks & Architecture The ecosystem for AI agent development has matured, with several key frameworks leading the way: While these frameworks offer unique features, successful agents typically share three core architectural components: Despite these strong foundations, production deployments often require customization to address high-scale workloads, security requirements, and system integrations. Planning & Execution Handling complex tasks requires advanced planning and execution flows, typically structured around: An agent’s effectiveness hinges on its ability to: ✅ Generate structured plans by intelligently combining tools and knowledge (e.g., correctly sequencing API calls for a customer refund request).✅ Validate each task step to prevent errors from compounding.✅ Optimize computational costs in long-running operations.✅ Recover from failures through dynamic replanning.✅ Apply multiple validation strategies, from structural verification to runtime testing.✅ Collaborate with other agents when consensus-based decisions improve accuracy. While multi-agent consensus models improve accuracy, they are computationally expensive. Even OpenAI finds that running parallel model instances for consensus-based responses remains cost-prohibitive, with ChatGPT Pro priced at $200/month. Running majority-vote systems for complex tasks can triple or quintuple costs, making single-agent architectures with robust planning and validation more viable for production use. Memory & Retrieval AI agents require advanced memory management to maintain context and learn from experience. Memory systems typically include: 1. Context Window 2. Working Memory (State Maintained During a Task) Key context management techniques: 3. Long-Term Memory & Knowledge Management AI agents rely on structured storage systems for persistent knowledge: Advanced Memory Capabilities Standardization efforts like Anthropic’s Model Context Protocol (MCP) are emerging to streamline memory integration, but challenges remain in balancing computational efficiency, consistency, and real-time retrieval. Security & Execution As AI agents gain autonomy, security and auditability become critical. Production deployments require multiple layers of protection: 1. Tool Access Control 2. Execution Validation 3. Secure Execution Environments 4. API Governance & Access Control 5. Monitoring & Observability 6. Audit Trails These security measures must balance flexibility, reliability, and operational control to ensure trustworthy AI-driven automation. Conclusion Building production-ready AI agents requires a carefully designed infrastructure that balances:✅ Advanced memory systems for context retention.✅ Sophisticated planning capabilities to break down tasks.✅ Secure execution environments with strong access controls. While AI agents offer immense potential, their adoption remains experimental across industries. Organizations must strategically evaluate where AI agents justify their complexity, ensuring that they provide clear, measurable benefits over traditional AI models. Like1 Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more The Salesforce Story In Marc Benioff’s own words How did salesforce.com grow from a start up in a rented apartment into the world’s Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Salesforce Enhances Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Engine Data science and analytics are rapidly becoming standard features in enterprise applications, Read more

Read More
Python-Based Reasoning

Building Intelligent Order Management Workflows

Mastering LangGraph: Building Intelligent Order Management Workflows Introduction In this comprehensive guide, we will explore LangGraph—a robust library designed for orchestrating complex, multi-step workflows with Large Language Models (LLMs). We will apply it to a practical e-commerce use case: determining whether to place or cancel an order based on a user’s query. By the end of this tutorial, you will understand how to: We will walk through each step in detail, making it accessible to beginners and useful for those seeking to develop dynamic, intelligent workflows using LLMs. A dataset link is also provided for hands-on experimentation. Table of Contents 1. What Is LangGraph? LangGraph is a library that brings a graph-based approach to LangChain workflows. Traditional pipelines follow a linear progression, but real-world tasks often involve branching logic, loops (e.g., retrying failed steps), or human intervention. Key Features: 2. The Problem Statement: Order Management The workflow needs to handle two types of user queries: Since these operations require decision-making, we will use LangGraph to implement a structured, conditional workflow: 3. Environment Setup and Imports Explanation of Key Imports: 4. Data Loading and State Definition Load Inventory and Customer Data Define the Workflow State 5. Creating Tools and Integrating LLMs Define the Order Cancellation Tool Initialize LLM and Bind Tools 6. Defining Workflow Nodes Query Categorization Check Inventory Compute Shipping Costs Process Payment 7. Constructing the Workflow Graph 8. Visualizing and Testing the Workflow Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more The Salesforce Story In Marc Benioff’s own words How did salesforce.com grow from a start up in a rented apartment into the world’s Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Salesforce Enhances Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Engine Data science and analytics are rapidly becoming standard features in enterprise applications, Read more

Read More
Agentic AI is Here

On Premise Gen AI

In 2025, enterprises transitioning generative AI (GenAI) into production after years of experimentation are increasingly considering on-premises deployment as a cost-effective alternative to the cloud. Since OpenAI ignited the AI revolution in late 2022, organizations have tested large language models powering GenAI services on platforms like AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud. These experiments demonstrated GenAI’s potential to enhance business operations while exposing the substantial costs of cloud usage. To avoid difficult conversations with CFOs about escalating cloud expenses, CIOs are exploring on-premises AI as a financially viable solution. Advances in software from startups and packaged infrastructure from vendors such as HPE and Dell are making private data centers an attractive option for managing costs. A survey conducted by Menlo Ventures in late 2024 found that 47% of U.S. enterprises with at least 50 employees were developing GenAI solutions in-house. Similarly, Informa TechTarget’s Enterprise Strategy Group reported a rise in enterprises considering on-premises and public cloud equally for new applications—from 37% in 2024 to 45% in 2025. This shift is reflected in hardware sales. HPE reported a 16% revenue increase in AI systems, reaching $1.5 billion in Q4 2024. During the same period, Dell recorded a record .6 billion in AI server orders, with its sales pipeline expanding by over 50% across various customer segments. “Customers are seeking diverse AI-capable server solutions,” noted David Schmidt, senior director of Dell’s PowerEdge server line. While heavily regulated industries have traditionally relied on on-premises systems to ensure data privacy and security, broader adoption is now driven by the need for cost control. Fortune 2000 companies are leading this trend, opting for private infrastructure over the cloud due to more predictable expenses. “It’s not unusual to see cloud bills exceeding 0,000 or even million per month,” said John Annand, an analyst at Info-Tech Research Group. Global manufacturing giant Jabil primarily uses AWS for GenAI development but emphasizes ongoing cost management. “Does moving to the cloud provide a cost advantage? Sometimes it doesn’t,” said CIO May Yap. Jabil employs a continuous cloud financial optimization process to maximize efficiency. On-Premises AI: Technology and Trends Enterprises now have alternatives to cloud infrastructure, including as-a-service solutions like Dell APEX and HPE GreenLake, which offer flexible pay-per-use pricing for AI servers, storage, and networking tailored for private data centers or colocation facilities. “The high cost of cloud drives organizations to seek more predictable expenses,” said Tiffany Osias, vice president of global colocation services at Equinix. Walmart exemplifies in-house AI development, creating tools like a document summarization app for its benefits help desk and an AI assistant for corporate employees. Startups are also enabling enterprises to build AI applications with turnkey solutions. “About 80% of GenAI requirements can now be addressed with push-button solutions from startups,” said Tim Tully, partner at Menlo Ventures. Companies like Ragie (RAG-as-a-service) and Lamatic.ai (GenAI platform-as-a-service) are driving this innovation. Others, like Squid AI, integrate custom AI agents with existing enterprise infrastructure. Open-source frameworks like LangChain further empower on-premises development, offering tools for creating chatbots, virtual assistants, and intelligent search systems. Its extension, LangGraph, adds functionality for building multi-agent workflows. As enterprises develop AI applications internally, consulting services will play a pivotal role. “Companies offering guidance on effective AI tool usage and aligning them with business outcomes will thrive,” Annand said. This evolution in AI deployment highlights the growing importance of balancing technological innovation with financial sustainability. Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more The Salesforce Story In Marc Benioff’s own words How did salesforce.com grow from a start up in a rented apartment into the world’s Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Salesforce Enhances Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Engine Data science and analytics are rapidly becoming standard features in enterprise applications, Read more

Read More
AI Assistants Using LangGraph

AI Assistants Using LangGraph

In the evolving world of AI, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems have become standard for handling straightforward queries and generating contextually relevant responses. However, as demand grows for more sophisticated AI applications, there is a need for systems that move beyond simple retrieval tasks. Enter AI agents—autonomous entities capable of executing complex, multi-step processes, maintaining state across interactions, and dynamically adapting to new information. LangGraph, a powerful extension of the LangChain library, is designed to help developers build these advanced AI agents, enabling stateful, multi-actor applications with cyclic computation capabilities. AI Assistants Using LangGraph. In this insight, we’ll explore how LangGraph revolutionizes AI development and provide a step-by-step guide to building your own AI agent using an example that computes energy savings for solar panels. This example will demonstrate how LangGraph’s unique features enable the creation of intelligent, adaptable, and practical AI systems. What is LangGraph? LangGraph is an advanced library built on top of LangChain, designed to extend Large Language Model (LLM) applications by introducing cyclic computational capabilities. While LangChain allows for the creation of Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) for linear workflows, LangGraph enhances this by enabling the addition of cycles—essential for developing agent-like behaviors. These cycles allow LLMs to continuously loop through processes, making decisions dynamically based on evolving inputs. LangGraph: Nodes, States, and Edges The core of LangGraph lies in its stateful graph structure: LangGraph redefines AI development by managing the graph structure, state, and coordination, allowing for the creation of sophisticated, multi-actor applications. With automatic state management and precise agent coordination, LangGraph facilitates innovative workflows while minimizing technical complexity. Its flexibility enables the development of high-performance applications, and its scalability ensures robust and reliable systems, even at the enterprise level. Step-by-step Guide Now that we understand LangGraph’s capabilities, let’s dive into a practical example. We’ll build an AI agent that calculates potential energy savings for solar panels based on user input. This agent can function as a lead generation tool on a solar panel seller’s website, providing personalized savings estimates based on key data like monthly electricity costs. This example highlights how LangGraph can automate complex tasks and deliver business value. Step 1: Import Necessary Libraries We start by importing the essential Python libraries and modules for the project. pythonCopy codefrom langchain_core.tools import tool from langchain_community.tools.tavily_search import TavilySearchResults from langchain_core.prompts import ChatPromptTemplate from langchain_core.runnables import Runnable from langchain_aws import ChatBedrock import boto3 from typing import Annotated from typing_extensions import TypedDict from langgraph.graph.message import AnyMessage, add_messages from langchain_core.messages import ToolMessage from langchain_core.runnables import RunnableLambda from langgraph.prebuilt import ToolNode Step 2: Define the Tool for Calculating Solar Savings Next, we define a tool to calculate potential energy savings based on the user’s monthly electricity cost. pythonCopy code@tool def compute_savings(monthly_cost: float) -> float: “”” Tool to compute the potential savings when switching to solar energy based on the user’s monthly electricity cost. Args: monthly_cost (float): The user’s current monthly electricity cost. Returns: dict: A dictionary containing: – ‘number_of_panels’: The estimated number of solar panels required. – ‘installation_cost’: The estimated installation cost. – ‘net_savings_10_years’: The net savings over 10 years after installation costs. “”” def calculate_solar_savings(monthly_cost): cost_per_kWh = 0.28 cost_per_watt = 1.50 sunlight_hours_per_day = 3.5 panel_wattage = 350 system_lifetime_years = 10 monthly_consumption_kWh = monthly_cost / cost_per_kWh daily_energy_production = monthly_consumption_kWh / 30 system_size_kW = daily_energy_production / sunlight_hours_per_day number_of_panels = system_size_kW * 1000 / panel_wattage installation_cost = system_size_kW * 1000 * cost_per_watt annual_savings = monthly_cost * 12 total_savings_10_years = annual_savings * system_lifetime_years net_savings = total_savings_10_years – installation_cost return { “number_of_panels”: round(number_of_panels), “installation_cost”: round(installation_cost, 2), “net_savings_10_years”: round(net_savings, 2) } return calculate_solar_savings(monthly_cost) Step 3: Set Up State Management and Error Handling We define utilities to manage state and handle errors during tool execution. pythonCopy codedef handle_tool_error(state) -> dict: error = state.get(“error”) tool_calls = state[“messages”][-1].tool_calls return { “messages”: [ ToolMessage( content=f”Error: {repr(error)}n please fix your mistakes.”, tool_call_id=tc[“id”], ) for tc in tool_calls ] } def create_tool_node_with_fallback(tools: list) -> dict: return ToolNode(tools).with_fallbacks( [RunnableLambda(handle_tool_error)], exception_key=”error” ) Step 4: Define the State and Assistant Class We create the state management class and the assistant responsible for interacting with users. pythonCopy codeclass State(TypedDict): messages: Annotated[list[AnyMessage], add_messages] class Assistant: def __init__(self, runnable: Runnable): self.runnable = runnable def __call__(self, state: State): while True: result = self.runnable.invoke(state) if not result.tool_calls and ( not result.content or isinstance(result.content, list) and not result.content[0].get(“text”) ): messages = state[“messages”] + [(“user”, “Respond with a real output.”)] state = {**state, “messages”: messages} else: break return {“messages”: result} Step 5: Set Up the LLM with AWS Bedrock We configure AWS Bedrock to enable advanced LLM capabilities. pythonCopy codedef get_bedrock_client(region): return boto3.client(“bedrock-runtime”, region_name=region) def create_bedrock_llm(client): return ChatBedrock(model_id=’anthropic.claude-3-sonnet-20240229-v1:0′, client=client, model_kwargs={‘temperature’: 0}, region_name=’us-east-1′) llm = create_bedrock_llm(get_bedrock_client(region=’us-east-1′)) Step 6: Define the Assistant’s Workflow We create a template and bind the tools to the assistant’s workflow. pythonCopy codeprimary_assistant_prompt = ChatPromptTemplate.from_messages( [ ( “system”, ”’You are a helpful customer support assistant for Solar Panels Belgium. Get the following information from the user: – monthly electricity cost Ask for clarification if necessary. ”’, ), (“placeholder”, “{messages}”), ] ) part_1_tools = [compute_savings] part_1_assistant_runnable = primary_assistant_prompt | llm.bind_tools(part_1_tools) Step 7: Build the Graph Structure We define nodes and edges for managing the AI assistant’s conversation flow. pythonCopy codebuilder = StateGraph(State) builder.add_node(“assistant”, Assistant(part_1_assistant_runnable)) builder.add_node(“tools”, create_tool_node_with_fallback(part_1_tools)) builder.add_edge(START, “assistant”) builder.add_conditional_edges(“assistant”, tools_condition) builder.add_edge(“tools”, “assistant”) memory = MemorySaver() graph = builder.compile(checkpointer=memory) Step 8: Running the Assistant The assistant can now be run through its graph structure to interact with users. python import uuidtutorial_questions = [ ‘hey’, ‘can you calculate my energy saving’, “my montly cost is $100, what will I save”]thread_id = str(uuid.uuid4())config = {“configurable”: {“thread_id”: thread_id}}_printed = set()for question in tutorial_questions: events = graph.stream({“messages”: (“user”, question)}, config, stream_mode=”values”) for event in events: _print_event(event, _printed) Conclusion By following these steps, you can create AI Assistants Using LangGraph to calculate solar panel savings based on user input. This tutorial demonstrates how LangGraph empowers developers to create intelligent, adaptable systems capable of handling complex tasks efficiently. Whether your application is in customer support, energy management, or other domains, LangGraph provides the Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched

Read More
AI Agent Workflows

AI Agent Workflows

AI Agent Workflows: The Ultimate Guide to Choosing Between LangChain and LangGraph Explore two transformative libraries—LangChain and LangGraph—both created by the same developer, designed to build Agentic AI applications. This guide dives into their foundational components, differences in handling functionality, and how to choose the right tool for your use case. Language Models as the Bridge Modern language models have unlocked revolutionary ways to connect users with AI systems and enable AI-to-AI communication via natural language. Enterprises aiming to harness Agentic AI capabilities often face the pivotal question: “Which tools should we use?” For those eager to begin, this question can become a roadblock. Why LangChain and LangGraph? LangChain and LangGraph are among the leading frameworks for crafting Agentic AI applications. By understanding their core building blocks and approaches to functionality, you’ll gain clarity on how each aligns with your needs. Keep in mind that the rapid evolution of generative AI tools means today’s truths might shift tomorrow. Note: Initially, this guide intended to compare AutoGen, LangChain, and LangGraph. However, AutoGen’s upcoming 0.4 release introduces a foundational redesign. Stay tuned for insights post-launch! Understanding the Basics LangChain LangChain offers two primary methods: Key components include: LangGraph LangGraph is tailored for graph-based workflows, enabling flexibility in non-linear, conditional, or feedback-loop processes. It’s ideal for cases where LangChain’s predefined structure might not suffice. Key components include: Comparing Functionality Tool Calling Conversation History and Memory Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Parallelism and Error Handling When to Choose LangChain, LangGraph, or Both LangChain Only LangGraph Only Using LangChain + LangGraph Together Final Thoughts Whether you choose LangChain, LangGraph, or a combination, the decision depends on your project’s complexity and specific needs. By understanding their unique capabilities, you can confidently design robust Agentic AI workflows. Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more The Salesforce Story In Marc Benioff’s own words How did salesforce.com grow from a start up in a rented apartment into the world’s Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Salesforce Enhances Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Engine Data science and analytics are rapidly becoming standard features in enterprise applications, Read more

Read More
Exploring Emerging LLM

Exploring Emerging LLM

Exploring Emerging LLM Agent Types and Architectures The Evolution Beyond ReAct AgentsThe shortcomings of first-generation ReAct agents have paved the way for a new era of LLM agents, bringing innovative architectures and possibilities. In 2024, agents have taken center stage in the AI landscape. Companies globally are developing chatbot agents, tools like MultiOn are bridging agents to external websites, and frameworks like LangGraph and LlamaIndex Workflows are helping developers build more structured, capable agents. However, despite their rising popularity within the AI community, agents are yet to see widespread adoption among consumers or enterprises. This leaves businesses wondering: How do we navigate these emerging frameworks and architectures? Which tools should we leverage for our next application? Having recently developed a sophisticated agent as a product copilot, we share key insights to guide you through the evolving agent ecosystem. What Are LLM-Based Agents? At their core, LLM-based agents are software systems designed to execute complex tasks by chaining together multiple processing steps, including LLM calls. These agents: The Rise and Fall of ReAct Agents ReAct (reason, act) agents marked the first wave of LLM-powered tools. Promising broad functionality through abstraction, they fell short due to their limited utility and overgeneralized design. These challenges spurred the emergence of second-generation agents, emphasizing structure and specificity. The Second Generation: Structured, Scalable Agents Modern agents are defined by smaller solution spaces, offering narrower but more reliable capabilities. Instead of open-ended design, these agents map out defined paths for actions, improving precision and performance. Key characteristics of second-gen agents include: Common Agent Architectures Agent Development Frameworks Several frameworks are now available to simplify and streamline agent development: While frameworks can impose best practices and tooling, they may introduce limitations for highly complex applications. Many developers still prefer code-driven solutions for greater control. Should You Build an Agent? Before investing in agent development, consider these criteria: If you answered “yes,” an agent may be a suitable choice. Challenges and Solutions in Agent Development Common Issues: Strategies to Address Challenges: Conclusion The generative AI landscape is brimming with new frameworks and fervent innovation. Before diving into development, evaluate your application needs and consider whether agent frameworks align with your objectives. By thoughtfully assessing the tools and architectures available, you can create agents that deliver measurable value while avoiding unnecessary complexity. Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more The Salesforce Story In Marc Benioff’s own words How did salesforce.com grow from a start up in a rented apartment into the world’s Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Salesforce Enhances Service Cloud with AI-Driven Intelligence Engine Data science and analytics are rapidly becoming standard features in enterprise applications, Read more

Read More
gettectonic.com