Technical Debt - gettectonic.com
Is Agentforce Different?

Is Agentforce Different?

The Salesforce hype machine is in full swing, with product announcements like Chatter, Einstein GPT, and Data Cloud, all positioned as revolutionary tools that promise to transform how we work. Is Agentforce Different? However, it’s often difficult to separate fact from fiction in the world of Salesforce. The cloud giant thrives on staying ahead of technological advancements, which means reinventing itself every year with new releases and updates. You could even say three times per year with the major releases. Why Enterprises Need Multiple Salesforce Orgs Over the past decade, Salesforce product launches have been hit or miss—primarily miss. Offerings like IoT Cloud, Work.com, and NFT Cloud have faded into obscurity. This contrasts sharply with Salesforce’s earlier successes, such as Service Cloud, the AppExchange, Force.com, Salesforce Lightning, and Chatter, which defined its first decade in business. One notable exception is Data Cloud. This product has seen significant success and now serves as the cornerstone of Salesforce’s future AI and data strategy. With Salesforce’s growth slowing quarter over quarter, the company must find new avenues to generate substantial revenue. Artificial Intelligence seems to be their best shot at reclaiming a leadership position in the next technological wave. Is Agentforce Different? While Salesforce has been an AI leader for over a decade, the hype surrounding last year’s Dreamforce announcements didn’t deliver the growth the company was hoping for. The Einstein Copilot Studio—comprising Copilot, Prompt Builder, and Model Builder—hasn’t fully lived up to expectations. This can be attributed to a lack of AI readiness among enterprises, the relatively basic capabilities of large language models (LLMs), and the absence of fully developed use cases. In Salesforce’s keynote, it was revealed that over 82 billion flows are launched weekly, compared to just 122,000 prompts executed. While Flow has been around for years, this stat highlights that the use of AI-powered prompts is still far from mainstream—less than one prompt per Salesforce customer per week, on average. When ChatGPT launched at the end of 2022, many predicted the dawn of a new AI era, expecting a swift and dramatic transformation of the workplace. Two years later, it’s clear that AI’s impact has yet to fully materialize, especially when it comes to influencing global productivity and GDP. However, Salesforce’s latest release feels different. While AI Agents may seem new to many, this concept has been discussed in AI circles for decades. Marc Benioff’s recent statements during Dreamforce reflect a shift in strategy, including a direct critique of Microsoft’s Copilot product, signaling the intensifying AI competition. This year’s marketing strategy around Agentforce feels like it could be the transformative shift we’ve been waiting for. While tools like Salesforce Copilot will continue to evolve, agents capable of handling service cases, answering customer questions, and booking sales meetings instantly promise immediate ROI for organizations. Is the Future of Salesforce in the Hands of Agents? Despite the excitement, many questions remain. Are Salesforce customers ready for agents? Can organizations implement this technology effectively? Is Agentforce a real breakthrough or just another overhyped concept? Agentforce may not be vaporware. Reports suggest that its development was influenced by Salesforce’s acquisition of Airkit.AI, a platform that claims to resolve 90% of customer queries. Salesforce has even set up dedicated launchpads at Dreamforce to help customers start building their own agents. Yet concerns remain, especially regarding Salesforce’s complexity, technical debt, and platform sprawl. These issues, highlighted in this year’s Salesforce developer report, cannot be overlooked. Still, it’s hard to ignore Salesforce’s strategic genius. The platform has matured to the point where it offers nearly every functionality an organization could need, though at times the components feel a bit disconnected. For instance: Salesforce is even hinting at usage-based pricing, with a potential $2 charge per conversation—an innovation that could reshape their pricing model. Will Agents Be Salesforce’s Key to Future Growth? With so many unknowns, only time will tell if agents will be the breakthrough Salesforce needs to regain the momentum of its first two decades. Regardless, agents appear to be central to the future of AI. Leading organizations like Copado are also launching their own agents, signaling that this trend will define the next phase of AI innovation. In today’s macroeconomic environment, where companies are overstretched and workforce demands are high, AI’s ability to streamline operations and improve customer service has never been more critical. Whoever cracks customer service AI first could lead the charge in the inevitable AI spending boom. We’re all waiting to see if Salesforce has truly cracked the AI code. But one thing is certain: the race to dominate AI in customer service has begun. And Salsesforce may be at the forefront. Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more The Salesforce Story In Marc Benioff’s own words How did salesforce.com grow from a start up in a rented apartment into the world’s Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Health Cloud Brings Healthcare Transformation Following swiftly after last week’s successful launch of Financial Services Cloud, Salesforce has announced the second installment in its series Read more

Read More
Technical Debt

Technical Debt

In the software industry, “Technical Debt” is perhaps the most frustrating term. This may be controversial, and clean architecture enthusiasts might disagree, but let’s dip into this topic. Defining Technical Debt During interviews, candidates are often asked to define “tech debt,” and surprisingly, each one provides a different answer. The industry seems to lack a consensus. These responses can generally be classified into a few categories: Common Issues with Definitions: The Ubiquity of Tech Debt Regardless of the definition, every company has tech debt. There’s always some code that is difficult to modify, not optimized, or based on an outdated framework. For instance, in 2014, parts of Amazon’s retail website were written in Perl, even though Java had become the standard. Despite its age and the lack of Perl expertise, this code was crucial and used daily by millions. Consensus on Tech Debt Despite varied definitions, one thing is consistent: tech debt is viewed negatively. Candidates often express concern when a company admits to having tech debt. Some even state they would not want to work for a company with tech debt. The Cost of Tech Debt The primary argument against tech debt is its cost. However, unlike financial loans with clear interest rates, tech debt is difficult to quantify. Observations of team velocity, for example, showed slower progress with monolithic architectures compared to microservices initially. Yet, as the number of microservices grew, maintenance burden increased, slowing progress despite cleaner architecture. Similarly, velocity comparisons between Android and iOS teams revealed that clean architecture principles did not always correlate with faster development or fewer bugs. Respecting Legacy Code The conversation about tech debt often implies that past decisions were mistakes. This presumption overlooks the context in which those decisions were made. For example, at Amazon, the use of an internal key-value storage system (Beaver) instead of DynamoDB was criticized, until it was pointed out that DynamoDB did not exist when the project started. Assuming good intentions and understanding the original constraints can provide valuable insights into past choices. Reevaluating Technical Debt Technical debt, like financial debt, can accumulate interest over time, making it more challenging to address the longer it is ignored. However, debt itself is not inherently bad. Just as financial debt can enable significant investments like buying a house or starting a company, technical debt can facilitate rapid development and market entry. For example, a startup’s initial mobile app, built quickly using React Native by a single front-end engineer, enabled the company to acquire thousands of clients and secure funding, ultimately allowing for the development of a native app by a dedicated team. Technical debt should be viewed as a tool rather than a liability. It can be beneficial if managed properly, enabling projects and growth. It is crucial to respect the decisions made by predecessors, recognizing the context and constraints they faced. Properly leveraging technical debt can provide time, attract clients, and unblock projects, turning it into a strategic advantage rather than a hindrance. Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more The Salesforce Story In Marc Benioff’s own words How did salesforce.com grow from a start up in a rented apartment into the world’s Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Health Cloud Brings Healthcare Transformation Following swiftly after last week’s successful launch of Financial Services Cloud, Salesforce has announced the second installment in its series Read more

Read More
Digital Transformation for Life Sciences

Digital Transformation for Life Sciences

In hindsight, one remarkable aspect of the COVID crisis was the speed with which vaccines passed through regulatory approval processes to address the pandemic emergency. Approvals that would typically take years were expedited to mere months, a pace not usually seen in the life sciences industry. It was an extraordinary situation, as Paul Shawah, Senior Vice President of Commercial Strategy at Veeva Systems, notes: “There were things that were unnaturally fast during COVID. There was a shifting of priorities, a shifting of focus. In some cases, you had the emergency approvals or the expedited approvals of the vaccines that you saw in the early days, so there was faster growth. Everything was kind of different in the COVID environment.” Today, the industry is not operating at that same rapid pace, but the impact of this acceleration remains significant: “What it did do is it challenged companies to think about why can’t we operate faster at a steady state? There was an old steady state, then there was COVID speed. The industry is trying to get to a new steady state. It won’t be as fast as during COVID because of unique circumstances, but expectations are now much higher. This drives a need to modernize systems, embrace the cloud, become more digital, and improve efficiency.” Companies like Veeva, alongside enterprise giants such as Salesforce, SAP, and Oracle, specialize in this market and play crucial roles in life sciences digitization. According to a McKinsey study, about 45% of tech spending in life sciences goes to three key technologies: applied Artificial Intelligence, industrialized Machine Learning, and Cloud Computing. Over 80% of the top 20 global pharma and medtech companies are operating in the cloud to some extent. However, a study by Accenture found that life sciences firms are among the lowest in achieving benefits from cloud investments, with only 43% satisfied with their results and less than a quarter confident that cloud migration initiatives will deliver the promised value within expected time frames. This presents both a challenge and an opportunity. Frank Defesche, SVP & GM of Life Sciences at Salesforce, sees it as the latter, stating: “The life sciences industry faces increased competition, evolving patient expectations, and ongoing pressure to bring devices and drugs to market faster. With rising drug costs, frustrated doctors, and varying regulatory scrutiny, life sciences organizations must find ways to do more with less.” The industry also contends with an unprecedented influx of data and disparate systems, making it difficult to move quickly. Addressing changes one by one is too slow and costly. Defesche believes that a systemic solution, fueled by connected data and Artificial Intelligence (AI), is key to overcoming these challenges. Paul Shawah of Veeva emphasizes the unique challenges of the life sciences sector: “Life sciences firms primarily do two things: discover and develop medicines, and commercialize them by educating doctors and getting the right drugs to patients. The drug development cycle includes clinical trials, managing everything related to drug safety, the manufacturing process, and ensuring quality. They also manage regulatory registrations. On the commercial side, it’s about reaching out to doctors and healthcare professionals.” Veeva’s Vault platform is designed for life sciences, with customers like Merck, Eli Lilly, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Shawah acknowledges it’s “still relatively early days” for cloud computing adoption but notes successes in areas like CRM, where Veeva achieved over 80% market share by standardizing processes and reducing technical debt. Other areas, like parts of the clinical trials process, remain largely untapped by cloud computing. Shawah sees opportunities to improve patient experiences and make the process more efficient. AI represents a significant area of opportunity. Shawah explains Veeva’s approach: “I’ll break AI into two categories: traditional AI, Machine Learning, and data science, which we’ve been doing for a long time, and generative AI, which is new. We’re focusing on finding use cases that create sustainable, repeatable value. We’re building capabilities into our Vault platform to support AI.” Joe Ferraro, VP of Product, Life Sciences at Salesforce, emphasizes AI’s critical role: “We are born out of the data and AI era, and we’re taking that philosophy into everything we do from a product standpoint. We aim to move from creating a system of record to a system of insight, using data and AI to transform how users interact with software.” Ferraro highlights the need for change: “Organizations told us, ‘Please don’t build the same thing we have now. We are mired in fragmented experiences. Our sales and marketing teams aren’t talking, and our medical and commercial teams don’t understand each other.’ Life Sciences Cloud aims to move the industry from these fragmented experiences to an end-to-end, AI-powered experience engine.” The COVID crisis highlighted the critical role of the life sciences industry. There’s a massive opportunity for digital transformation, whether through specialists like Veeva or enterprise players like Salesforce, Oracle, and SAP. Data must be the foundation of any solution, especially amidst the current AI hype cycle. Ensuring this data is well-managed is a crucial starting point for industry-wide change. Like Related Posts Salesforce OEM AppExchange Expanding its reach beyond CRM, Salesforce.com has launched a new service called AppExchange OEM Edition, aimed at non-CRM service providers. Read more The Salesforce Story In Marc Benioff’s own words How did salesforce.com grow from a start up in a rented apartment into the world’s Read more Salesforce Jigsaw Salesforce.com, a prominent figure in cloud computing, has finalized a deal to acquire Jigsaw, a wiki-style business contact database, for Read more Health Cloud Brings Healthcare Transformation Following swiftly after last week’s successful launch of Financial Services Cloud, Salesforce has announced the second installment in its series Read more

Read More
gettectonic.com